+rep limitation

[Alex3213]

I think 150 hours is a suitable time (so that's around 6 days, I just think 150hours sounds like a nice time) but definitely should be changed to.

P.S. It was Minstrels or however he spells it

[Conservative,]

I think 150 hours is a suitable time (so that's around 6 days, I just think 150hours sounds like a nice time) but definitely should be changed to.

P.S. It was Minstrels or however he spells it

Oh my bad...thought someone said Milestone..didn't check it tbh

[Apple]

This always gets brought up, it's probably been discussed about 5 - 10 times in the last couple of years but the thread just always seems to die out with management being adamant that it will not change.

[beth]

48 hours is far too quick, i mean i only browse really once every 2 days and if the rep limit was that i could pointlessly rep my favourites constantly. aha.

[Inseriousity.]

Personally, I'd get rid of any limitation on it. It's only rep. It doesn't actually mean much anyway in the grand scheme of things. That's just me

[beth]

Personally, I'd get rid of any limitation on it. It's only rep. It doesn't actually mean much anyway in the grand scheme of things. That's just me

but then in a way it kinda disregards the people who've been here for years and built their rep count up over the years.
it makes it worthless if it's just thrown around.

[Inseriousity.]

but then in a way it kinda disregards the people who've been here for years and built their rep count up over the years.
it makes it worthless if it's just thrown around.

It is worthless.
And it doesn't disregard the people who have built it up because I imagine if there was no limitation that it'd be those same people who'd benefit from it most.

I just don't see what the fuss is over something on an online forum and if people want to abuse it then let them as I think the majority of people though wouldn't change their rep habits, they'd just be able to +rep the people they wanted to +rep anyway. -reps can be dealt with in the same method it does now.

[Conservative,]

Personally, I'd get rid of any limitation on it. It's only rep. It doesn't actually mean much anyway in the grand scheme of things. That's just me

Lol I agree with you.

[Jamesy]

This always gets brought up, it's probably been discussed about 5 - 10 times in the last couple of years but the thread just always seems to die out with management being adamant that it will not change.

Apart from the last thread where I said I would look into it when I had time .

It is worthless.
And it doesn't disregard the people who have built it up because I imagine if there was no limitation that it'd be those same people who'd benefit from it most.

I just don't see what the fuss is over something on an online forum and if people want to abuse it then let them as I think the majority of people though wouldn't change their rep habits, they'd just be able to +rep the people they wanted to +rep anyway. -reps can be dealt with in the same method it does now.

I think total freedom like that would be bad. There needs to be some structure, but I do agree a time based system is better than the current in terms of freeing up the system. However it would need some custom coding so it's on the bottom of the to-do list at the moment. Also 5 days seems an acceptable limit.

[Eoin247]

I agree that the rep system needs to be changed, a few time i couldn't +rep a person because of the current system an they did deserve +rep.