Would you pay $2,668 For Headphones?

[Recursion]

I suggest buying a pair of headphones that are actually superb, such as the Audio-Technica ATH-A[D]700, they are truly superb and are crisp as hell.

Of course, you'll need a soundcard or device that does them justice, not an iPod... those things pump out crap like the world's ending.

[Agnostic Bear]

Of course, you'll need a soundcard or device that does them justice, not an iPod... those things pump out crap like the world's ending.

The AD700s should sound ok on an iPod, the A700s wont though (The AD700s only have an impedance of 32 ohms)

[N!ck]

Of course, you'll need a soundcard or device that does them justice, not an iPod... those things pump out crap like the world's ending.

iPod sounds better than most portable players.

The AD700s should sound ok on an iPod, the A700s wont though (The AD700s only have an impedance of 32 ohms)

That's what the portable headphone amp is for.

[Fiendly]

Those headphones look terrible.. What would happen if you cut the cord!?
lol!

[Red]

They don't look worth a button

[GommeInc]

Of course, you'll need a soundcard or device that does them justice, not an iPod... those things pump out crap like the world's ending.

Unfortunately other MP3 player manufacturers seem to be dumbing down their sound quality these days. I remember when Sony and Creative made devices that had perfect sound quality, but lately it's become safe to say any portable device is useless at producing decent sound quality. That said, Creative still have their X-Fi emulators(?) on their MP3 players, but they're not that good for battery life and after a while they get fed up of all the hard work and decide to reduce the volume

Speaking of the old days, do iPods still have that game where it plays a random section of a song and you have to guess what song it is?

/rantaboutmp3players

[ROT]

i actually would theyre rly nice