with or without? :)

[Gina]

would you rather read a book with pictures, or without?
personally i'd say pictures, just because it makes it easier for me

Thread closed by Jordan (Forum Super Moderator): Due to lack of discussion and 1-2 worded answers

[Samantha]

Nah without as you read books so reading most of the time means words. Don't get me wrong I don't mind pictures in them it breaks it up but I prefer without mainly.

[scottish]

Neither I'm straight.

Edited by Chris (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not make off topic posts!

[Jurv]

i would probably have to say with pictures without sounding too childish.
i tend to read autobiographies/biographies and i think it's a really nice idea when they include pictures inbetween.

[Gina]

i would probably have to say with pictures without sounding too childish.
i tend to read autobiographies/biographies and i think it's a really nice idea when they include pictures inbetween.

exactly this

[Neversoft]

Neither or both. This isn't a one or the other question, and something like Where the Wild Things Are is incomparable to The Catcher in the Rye. Both hold equal artistic value in their own individual sense.

[Sloths]

I prefer proper novels and they don't tend to have pictures it

[orientalframe?]

i prefer without pictures, i just find it easier to read for some reason!

[Jssy]

When I'm reading I like to use my imagination so without

[JerseySafety]

with usually, cant stand reading hundreds of pages with just text.