Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,818
    Tokens
    64,172
    Habbo
    FlyingJesus

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dbgtz View Post
    Surely by removing the branding and all of that, companies can produce the boxes cheaper and therefore get a larger profit. Therefore if profit is taxed rather than revenue (I'm not sure which is actually taxed), it means more money for the government?
    You can't expect socialists to understand economics
    | TWITTER |



    Blessed be
    + * + * + * +

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Middlesbrough, England
    Posts
    9,336
    Tokens
    10,837

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Cigarettes are now so expensive my dad buys the cheap ****. God knows what added nasties are in them so I'm not a fan of this change, making it easier for them to fake. The government will never want to stop smokers/drinkers from quitting altogether as it provides great tax for the treasury so it comes up with half-baked ideas like hiding **** and removing their labels etc as a PR stunt to show it cares. Addiction and peer pressure are a lot harder to tackle, after all.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •