hxhd snq questions

[Samantha]

As if I'm the first SNQ host to do that.. -.- It doesn't show lack of planning, I just misread it. How long I took? Uh.. good? Then you'll see I didn't plan them today or too quickly, because I actually took time into planning it.

Next time, if there is one I suggest being more open to suggestions and admitting when you're wrong.

[Succubus]

So now you're talking about stuff that has nothing to do with the feedback thread? Alright..
And you said ''you done two on another same topic'', which was the part I didn't get. I did spread them out. I had TV; music, art, drinks, history, geography, etc. It was spread.

Cool so you had variety in genre. But no one wants 4 questions on the same bloody topic which you so much enjoy, it's like me doing 4 questions on Resident evil or something - I Wouldn't do it because it's bound to cause something like it has already. UGH.

[LiquidLuck.]

You were told the other day by management not to do it... I am not sure why Rosy approved them but you should have enough common sense to know that 4 questions just on twilight is not going to go down well.

I was not told it, no. You and Maria were talking about it, and we came to the conclusion a SNQ all about twilight wouldn't do it, because then only a true fan would win it. So when I PM'ed my questions to Rosy I told her I had 4 about Twilight, and nothing having anything against it, I hosted it. Also 4 questions about Twilight is nothing and they were just bothered because they didn't win, like it happens in every single SNQ. -.-

[xxMATTGxx]

I was not told it, no. You and Maria were talking about it, and we came to the conclusion a SNQ all about twilight wouldn't do it, because then only a true fan would win it. So when I PM'ed my questions to Rosy I told her I had 4 about Twilight, and nothing having anything against it, I hosted it. Also 4 questions about Twilight is nothing and they were just bothered because they didn't win, like it happens in every single SNQ. -.-

Four questions about one specific thing such as "Twilight" where not everyone would have seen the movies or read the books would be silly to do. 1 or 2 questions about it is fine but no more.

[Samantha]

I was not told it, no. You and Maria were talking about it, and we came to the conclusion a SNQ all about twilight wouldn't do it, because then only a true fan would win it. So when I PM'ed my questions to Rosy I told her I had 4 about Twilight, and nothing having anything against it, I hosted it. Also 4 questions about Twilight is nothing and they were just bothered because they didn't win, like it happens in every single SNQ. -.-

Right, can you actually go back to most of your replies and learn what a ******* opinion is compared to a fact? For God sake, 4 Twilight questions isn't nothing it's definitely something as it's what we and many called BIASED. Only true fans would know about Twilight in general too really as it proved tonight, 4 questions were too much; if you're going to plan do it on different films from different genres and split it down further. I seriously can't see how you think everything you say is set in stone. So Rosy didn't say anything, could be various reasons surrounding that but use common sense, 4 out of 20 is 1/5, far too much unless you were doing 5 set themes.

[Succubus]

I was not told it, no. You and Maria were talking about it, and we came to the conclusion a SNQ all about twilight wouldn't do it, because then only a true fan would win it. So when I PM'ed my questions to Rosy I told her I had 4 about Twilight, and nothing having anything against it, I hosted it. Also 4 questions about Twilight is nothing and they were just bothered because they didn't win, like it happens in every single SNQ. -.-

But you wouldn't of had a single thought that it would end up like this? Hmm... And yes, it is something. 4 is too many, blah blah I've said it all before. We are just going around in circles, sigh. And actually no, for once I actually agree with people moaning about SnQ with these questions, because 4 on twilight is not fair. even with google.

[LiquidLuck.]

Next time, if there is one I suggest being more open to suggestions and admitting when you're wrong.

First, I don't think I'm wrong as even Kyle quoted what I said in the beginning of the quiz. And I was open to suggestions and made only 4 questions about it, which Managers didn't find too much.

---------- Post added 24-11-2012 at 08:21 PM ----------

Four questions about one specific thing such as "Twilight" where not everyone would have seen the movies or read the books would be silly to do. 1 or 2 questions about it is fine but no more.

Like I said before, why not make it a rule then? Or ask the SNQ host to send the questions to GM as well? That way like 5 people could have an opinion about it.

[Succubus]

First, I don't think I'm wrong as even Kyle quoted what I said in the beginning of the quiz. And I was open to suggestions and made only 4 questions about it, which Managers didn't find too much.

Managers may of not found it too much, but players did. Managers aren't always right.

[Samantha]

First, I don't think I'm wrong as even Kyle quoted what I said in the beginning of the quiz. And I was open to suggestions and made only 4 questions about it, which Managers didn't find too much.

---------- Post added 24-11-2012 at 08:21 PM ----------



Like I said before, why not make it a rule then? Or ask the SNQ host to send the questions to GM as well? That way like 5 people could have an opinion about it.

5 people shouldn't have to have an opinion about it, you should ensure it's fair and if you need to get someone to do that for you then why host? The quiz isn't ever going to be completely fair and go without a hitch but you should really know 4 questions on a film YOU enjoy isn't going to do it for those who don't I'd have rather had seen 4 about recent films or something than just one [film].

[LiquidLuck.]

Right, can you actually go back to most of your replies and learn what a ******* opinion is compared to a fact? For God sake, 4 Twilight questions isn't nothing it's definitely something as it's what we and many called BIASED. Only true fans would know about Twilight in general too really as it proved tonight, 4 questions were too much; if you're going to plan do it on different films from different genres and split it down further. I seriously can't see how you think everything you say is set in stone. So Rosy didn't say anything, could be various reasons surrounding that but use common sense, 4 out of 20 is 1/5, far too much unless you were doing 5 set themes.

As it was proved tonight? At least one guy answered a question about Twilight, and he wasn't a fan. Oh now using the ethos technique, nice, show a lot. I don't think what I say is set in stone, as I didn't do an all themed SNQ about twilight. I got it down to 2 questions, and like I said, it gave everyone the opportunity to win. You know the way you say that spelling shouldn't count because we could just ''understand'' what someone meant? Well, in my point of view, this way, you don't had to be extremely knowledged about other facts (even if they pretty much were), and you could still have a chance to win. That's why I think themed SNQs will be fun and good to do, so other people can win, even if they aren't brilliant enough to know everything about GK.