Xarea

[scottish]

Also just looked at ex (asst) managers, DJ-3000 ain't on it?

[sex]

Just a general comment with this article, and pretty much the whole of the wiki, most of the things written are all opinions - which I'm pretty sure aren't the point of a wiki.

This, it may aswell just be a bunch of articles about a lot of Habbo things, there is more opinion than fact lol

[Kardan]

Also just looked at ex (asst) managers, DJ-3000 ain't on it?

Half the things aren't on it.

Jibbi doesn't exist according to HabboxWiki.

[scottish]

Lmao, suppose all staff now are like 2008+ mainly ;l

[Chippiewill]

http://habboxwiki.com/Xarae

his name is Xarea not Xarae.. I would do this but effort making an account, plus I don't know if regular users can edit titles?

Can't edit titles but you can move pages to a different title. I thought I made it so normal users can move pages however I'll double check that.

AFAIK titles can't be changed, new pages need to be made. If you don't like the content itself then nothing's stopping you from changing it!!

How did you work on the wiki for however many months and firstly not notice and secondly me not notice you didn't notice :S

Pretty sure within database you can change titles

I don't think I would ever touch mediawiki from the database the architecture of it's pretty complex. Most of the stuff in the db is stored as encoded BLOBs so changing it there is a lot of effort to begin with.

Just a general comment with this article, and pretty much the whole of the wiki, most of the things written are all opinions - which I'm pretty sure aren't the point of a wiki.

As far as priorities are concerned, ensuring content is written in a suitable manner is one of our main priorities. Unfortunately we sometimes will not come across a page for a while so we cannot ensure every page is up to standard. For those reasons complaining about individual pages or a group of pages isn't too helpful, what is helpful is making the corrections yourself which you are now free todo with or without a Habbox Wiki account. Calling the entire wiki 'opinions' is a bit far, from my experience most pages are written to a good enough standard for Habbox use, maybe in places it could be better but we don't have anywhere near as many active editors per page as wikipedia does. Generally it's staff bios which get a bit subjective.

Also just looked at ex (asst) managers, DJ-3000 ain't on it?

DJ-3000 does have a (empty) page and is listed in the hall of fame. There are a lot of ex habbox managers and keeping track of every page on every one of them is quite time consuming.

Half the things aren't on it.

Jibbi doesn't exist according to HabboxWiki.

As before there are a lot of ex managers, you are free to register and make pages which you think are appropriate. Most of the people added are people who were or are current managers, or are listed in the HoF or have Habbox Merit.

[lawrawrrr]

How did you work on the wiki for however many months and firstly not notice and secondly me not notice you didn't notice :S

not notice what? the spelling? 'cos I wasn't working on ex managers

[GoldenMerc]

How many pages in percentage are actually done, I mean complete with content to this date.

[Lee]

i know i'm not one to criticise english, but some of the article on that wiki are so hard to read lol

Fix it then!

[David]

How many pages in percentage are actually done, I mean complete with content to this date.

just used the random page feature, 2/10 pages had the under construction template, about 6 of the others had like 2-3 lines of content.

i'd say a not very high percentage.

[Chippiewill]

just used the random page feature, 2/10 pages had the under construction template, about 6 of the others had like 2-3 lines of content.

i'd say a not very high percentage.

Mediawiki biases the random page feature with recently cached pages so it's fairly difficult to estimate like that. The number of pages with the construction template is around 200 - 250. The number of actually 'short' pages is 240 ish.