Fire Comity and vls

[Kardan]

I meant we've started to refuse events that hosts have hosted too much. If that makes sense? We're not stopping them from hosting we're just asking that they branch out more.

Yup, that makes sense

[FlyingJesus]

We've now also started refusing to book events if we feel that the Events Organiser has hosted too much.

So glad this got explained properly in a later post, was about to get fully riled up about hosting being turned down certainly agree that stopping hosts from only hosting a couple of things over and over is a good idea though, that's a good step

Unfortunately we haven't received any complaints regarding staff being bullied.

I know for a fact that this is untrue considering the details of DailyBread's resignation. I know that it's difficult to act on anything that doesn't have screenie evidence but this is not the first time that certain people have been accused of bullying within the department so I for one will definitely be keeping an eye out for it. Attitude has been a fairly big issue in recent months sadly, especially among the older EOs

Quality of prizes has come up in this thread too. We do have an events prize fund in place but this isn't as good as it could be mainly due to funding. Yes, the lottery is a great way of getting funds for the department but I'm spending £30-40 from my own pocket a month on credits on top of the ones from the lottery to keep the prize fund running. Habbo have a double credits offer on at the moment so perhaps I can buy some more tomorrow.

I seriously think that the potential of the grabber is being overlooked to a cataclysmic degree. It's open when the lottery's being done but that's 1-2 hours a week, and with the odds of winning on grabbers being so low it would surely be a massive boost to on-client revenue if it could be run more often. I'm not 100% on which depts count as community these days but I'm sure there are enough [asst]managers in the comms sphere to be running a grabber more often, and it's something that people seem to really enjoy playing despite the crap odds they face. It shouldn't come down to you having to spend that much of your own money when there are so many people on the client lining up to give their creds away

Lack of staff is another issue we're facing at the moment. When Graham was staff he raised a very good point which has been mentioned previously in this thread. Instead of just welcoming people to events we need to start having proper conversations rather than the usual "Hello how're you?" We need to start making friends with potential members and encourage them to stick around and perhaps even apply to a Habbox role.

Definitely noticed this. Most hosts just have a welcome message at the start of a game and if we're lucky a c&p line saying to sign up which looks even more robotic than the replies in welcome threads. When people ask what rep is, instead of saying that it's a reward system (or anything even remotely resembling a positive advert) there's the utterly useless reply of "rep on habboxforum" which explains nothing and doesn't entice anyone to take part. Hosts should perhaps keep in mind that if they can sell the idea of rep to people then not only do we get more members but they pay out less in prizes, everyone's a winnerrrrrrrrrr except the people that lose every event like Slaq