Leave moderating to the moderators rule is ridiculous and lame and stupid

[MKR&*42]

Just checked and the two from 25th have been dealt with (one by a mod and one by an smod) but both are still 'open' so idk .

Oh I checked the thread I reported and the issue wasn't solved (the thread should have been closed as it's a duplicate)
--
Oh nvm nick dealt with it 10am this morning LOL.

[Kardan]

Just checked and the two from 25th have been dealt with (one by a mod and one by an smod) but both are still 'open' so idk .

I have one from the 22nd still outstanding.

[e5]

Who on earth has try to impersonate a moderator?

Using mod warns and people just generally wanting to be me

[islamicindian]

*REMOVED*

[FlyingJesus]

I have a report from like the 6th that still hasn't been sorted out because e5 hid it and VMd me telling me not to report him rather than admit that he'd misdealt with the problem

[Calum0812]

Mods clearly slacking. I made a report;

Yesterday 12:27 AM

Still not been dealt with...?

Only two people to deal with all the reports, on top of all the reports that we give to them as normal moderators so I think the process is a little slower at the moment.

Still not sorted... So calum can warn me and @Kardan; within maybe 15 mins, Yet this has been here for over 24 hrs?

I was out today, and besides I don't moderate feedback

I thought mods are supposed to wait until the 15 min editing time is up in case you edit your post e.g. add on something so that it's not pointless any more? Unless ofc it's something that requires immediate attention.

I have reports from 25th still waiting for a response .

I've never heard of the first point but I guess it seems logical. There is no such rule though I don't think
I have reports waiting too

Wow wth. Aren't there a good 6/7 mods or so? It shouldn't take this long

There are but the only ones with powers in feedback are James (Despect), Elliott (e5), Nick and Phil.
Phil is on limited activity and Nick was probably sleeping.

[Phil]

Hey guys! Sorry, I've been on Limited Activity! Pretty crazy week for me and I've just gotten the chance to read through this now.

Okay, I don't think there's necessarily any problem with this rule and I'm not sure if it needs to be changed. I agree with what Nick is saying about informing someone that the topic already exists but while still discussing the matter of the thread is fine. This is because posting in the wrong area, posting a duplicate thread etc. isn't really breaking any rules. This is why we VM for this and it doesn't get a usernote.

I would much prefer people used the report feature if someone breaks a rule instead of doing it publicly in a thread and for that reason I'm going to keep the rule in place and make no immediate changes. I agree that it should be more lax in Spam but only when it's banter between friends. In saying that, I'm not going to make any changes to the PM's that have already been given because as far as I remember, you were being immature and targeting the mods or a member of the moderation team (forgive me if I'm wrong - it would make a change if you weren't)

Sorry again for the long awaited reply.

[Kardan]

Hey guys! Sorry, I've been on Limited Activity! Pretty crazy week for me and I've just gotten the chance to read through this now.

Okay, I don't think there's necessarily any problem with this rule and I'm not sure if it needs to be changed. I agree with what Nick is saying about informing someone that the topic already exists but while still discussing the matter of the thread is fine. This is because posting in the wrong area, posting a duplicate thread etc. isn't really breaking any rules. This is why we VM for this and it doesn't get a usernote.

I would much prefer people used the report feature if someone breaks a rule instead of doing it publicly in a thread and for that reason I'm going to keep the rule in place and make no immediate changes. I agree that it should be more lax in Spam but only when it's banter between friends. In saying that, I'm not going to make any changes to the PM's that have already been given because as far as I remember, you were being immature and targeting the mods or a member of the moderation team (forgive me if I'm wrong - it would make a change if you weren't)

Sorry again for the long awaited reply.

When were we targeting mods?

And I'm never listening to @xxMATTGxx; again

[xxMATTGxx]

When were we targeting mods?

And I'm never listening to @xxMATTGxx; again

But Kardan we are like best friends

[Phil]

When were we targeting mods?

And I'm never listening to @xxMATTGxx; again

When are you not giving e5 a hard time