View Poll Results: Should we bring infected aid workers back

Voters
24. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes it's the right thing to do

    5 20.83%
  • HELL NAA

    7 29.17%
  • meh don't care, will never care

    2 8.33%
  • in ma mums car broom broom

    10 41.67%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    6,444
    Tokens
    6,671

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    you're an idiot

    also them broom car voters are idiots too :¬:

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    690
    Tokens
    5,879

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    The american doctor is being moved to a specialized and prepared hospital to treat him, with safe transport. Ebola is not transmitted on air by the way.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Yorkshire, United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,918
    Tokens
    7,000
    Habbo
    Jssy

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    the media hypes everything up so yano





  4. #14
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,128
    Tokens
    1,518
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    It would literally take an act of God to get politicians to close or at least control the borders, so good luck everyone.

    On the good side of things, viruses and diseases don't discriminate..... Islington, Westminster and Washington DC are just as at risk.


    And if you wanna buy me flowers
    Just go ahead now
    And if you like to talk for hours
    Just go ahead now


  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,713
    Tokens
    2,371
    Habbo
    James

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    it says on the bbc website that its transferred through blood, bodily fluids and somethingabout internal organs. you wont get ebola. its mainly affecting poor countries who can't all afford clean water.

    Bringing people back is the right thing to do imo because put yourselves in their shoes. if your country refused to let you go home because you're ill, how would you feel?

    As long as everything is secure and all that, then its fine.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    England
    Posts
    31
    Tokens
    168

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Putting myself in their shoes, I wouldn't even travel there in the first place. They could kill millions by bringing a deadly disease to America which could easily mutate, becoming airborne. In an urbanised environment such as the USA, this is a disaster.
    "throw down your mistempered weapons to the ground"

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,069
    Tokens
    4,220
    Habbo
    Dragga

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Well currently, Ebola can only survive in a fluids, and is not yet "Airborne" BUT, they can be trapped in airborne heavy water particles. Which can occur from someone simply sneezing. The particles dont stay in the air to long, and can't travel that far.

    From RT News it seems that someone from Wales is infected. You can read about it here: http://rt.com/uk/178204-wales-ebola-monitor-uk/

    I suggest you might want to be cautious around people until this whole thing (hopefully) blows over.

    Purell and Surgical Masks for all!

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    England
    Posts
    7,427
    Tokens
    13,424
    Habbo
    Empired

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by God View Post
    From RT News it seems that someone from Wales is infected. You can read about it here: http://rt.com/uk/178204-wales-ebola-monitor-uk/
    no...

    "possible"
    "potential"
    "may"
    "not showing any concrete symptoms"
    "no confirmed incidences"
    "if the individual develops suspicious symptoms"

    The article does not say "someone from Wales is infected", it says someone from Wales may be infected but they are not sure. It's very likely nothing dangerous, but they're right to be cautious nonetheless. They also have a good plan with what to do with the patient if it does turn out to be ebola.

    For now, I don't believe it'll kill us all. Like Rhyss said, life-threatening diseases are popping up all the time which are supposedly "endangering the world's population", but hey we're all still here. We'll just have to watch and see what happens. Wash your hands, folks:¬:

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Intersocial View Post
    prob gonna expect another overexaggeration by WHO i am sure there is no giant risk to the uk
    Pretty much what I think too. They over-exaggerated about swine flu, claiming thousands had died when it was only about 136 and that was direct exposure rather than spread through the air as was the claim at the time.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •