Hey Anne Frank Death Believers: You've Got a Problem

[MightyMagician]

Could have, yes, but not necessarily. The stats on the page you linked show 58,240 Jewish prisoners dead of typhus in the time she was there, out of 173,000. It's far more reasonable to assume that she was one of the 114,760 Jews present without typhus - it's nearly twice as likely, in fact



They didn't, that's kinda the point



How is that contradictory? A whole bunch of Auschwitz prisoners (who you seem to think ALL had typhus) turn up in late 1944, and early 1945 there's a typhus epidemic there. It matches up perfectly.

I mentioned the portion that corresponded to the 2 months they were there, and it doesn't list surviving inmates who were transferred. If Anne and Margot were in a train ca with infected inmates = Typhus. Which is why I stated survival until march was impossible. Anne and Margot would have been to Belsen in early November or by Halloween, maybe. They would have had to survive an additional 4 months with typhus while the other arrivals with them were spreading it in the camp. The outbreak would have happened before 1945, but this simply is not what happened.

[Kardan]

i'd like to see what happens if i answer this with a yes
so yes

I think I'd go with yes as well - I believe Anne Frank died.

What is the actual point of this thread @Tallcoolguy700; - Do you want to change how she died on her death certificate or something?

[MightyMagician]

I'm saying it's likely that Auguste Van Pels helped Anne and Margot go to another camp where they were more likely to survive. In April of 1945 she went to the Theresienstadt camp. She probably knew people were heading there from Belsen so she tried to save them.

[FlyingJesus]

If Anne and Margot were in a train ca with infected inmates = Typhus.

If. Two thirds of the inmates did not have typhus, so it's very reasonable to assume that Anne was among that majority

Which is why I stated survival until march was impossible. Anne and Margot would have been to Belsen in early November or by Halloween, maybe. They would have had to survive an additional 4 months with typhus while the other arrivals with them were spreading it in the camp. The outbreak would have happened before 1945, but this simply is not what happened.

If that's the case then it's logical to assume that the prisoners moved from A to B were free of typhus at the time and contracted it at a later date. The very stats that you are using are working against you on all fronts

I'm saying it's likely that Auguste Van Pels helped Anne and Margot go to another camp where they were more likely to survive. In April of 1945 she went to the Theresienstadt camp. She probably knew people were heading there from Belsen so she tried to save them.

April 1945 is a bit late to be trying to save someone who most likely had already died in February. Not even sure what you're trying to claim any more, it's just garbled nonsense

[GommeInc]

"Nurse, help! He's out of bed again!"

This debate is dead and buried, unnecessary and has no baring on life today. Get over it.

[Firehorse]

Anne and Margot Frank were in Auschwitz for roughly 2 months from September to October, right? Check this link: http://www.heretical.com/miscella/rudolf.html

Over 6000 typhus deaths in that camp from that period, and this isn't even counting the typhus inmates who were allegedly sent to the gas chambers. If Anne Frank was fragile enough to get Scabies during her time there, why not typhus? Especially considering how easily it spread?

Why are you so obsessed with this?

[Becca]

oh dear captain autismo strikes again

[wixard]

all in favour of tallcoolguy to replace undertaker as debates leader say AYE

[Becca]

ayeeeee

[FlyingJesus]

Pretty sure it's the same person anyway