Ixjust put in a geanrilsed view covering a few psoibl situtions, athogh being more persifci woudl make it eaqsyer to aruge 1 way or the other.
If they are a mental paitent they have even more chance of causing harm to you and not even know what they are doing
Bye bye people ive had a great time here i just have no reason to stay anymore
Depends what you're talking about. The Iraq situation of course I would Shoot him.
Self defense = Right, but its still taking a humans life
Just doing it = WRONG
Accidentally = Bad, and must be terribe fo rthe perosn who did it
I wish I could vote but I cant, it is normally always wrong, that person has the right to live and no one can take it away from them without an explantation, although, thats not a good way to handle it either.
Thats exactly my point.... i dunno what id do... killing for fu is wrong i dont even like animal killing for no reason like rabbits and fox hunting
Bye bye people ive had a great time here i just have no reason to stay anymore
As all the others have stated, you need to specify in which situation is it right or wrong to kill.
Otherwise we could be here for awhile..
mmmm... that is a very broad question, if you are refering to the war going on in Iraq think of it as utilitarianism. Although many lives have been lost, and a majority of which innocent, ultimately in the long run everyone is better off and more lives have been saved.
I think thats wrong, if there was no violence, no-one would have to defend themselves...
Violence doesn't solve anything..
I know I sound like a hippy but its true...
If only it was that easy aimee.. unfortunetly no1 is perfect and its definetly not a perfect world. Sometimes violence is the only way in some situations.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!