Did America land on the moon in 1969? - [Closes 23/12/07]

[Ugawa]

I think they faked it.

[Slowpoke]

No-one has ever been on the moon imo. Neil Armstrong was meant to have been the first man on the moon yet the person filming was already outside of the Space Shuttle!!

[JFolan]

Maybe you should, you'd learn something.

Also the flag, footprints etc from the visit wouldn't be visible as they'd have been destroyed in the blasts from takeoff.

Blasts from there little rockets on there cardboard box shuttle? an plus they left the moon car thing up there so tht should sitll be there plus the feather and rock they dropped.

[FlyingJesus]

No-one has ever been on the moon imo. Neil Armstrong was meant to have been the first man on the moon yet the person filming was already outside of the Space Shuttle!!

Yeah because it's impossible for vehicles as technologically inferior as, say, a space shuttle to have something as advanced as an extendable arm with a camera.

Blasts from there little rockets on there cardboard box shuttle? an plus they left the moon car thing up there so tht should sitll be there plus the feather and rock they dropped.

Well I don't know about the moon car, but it's too small to be seen anyway, and the moon is fairly big y'know, so pinpointing the exact spot they landed at before would be a task. As for a feather and a rock; the feather would certainly have burned up, and the moon is made of rocks.

[JFolan]

Yeah because it's impossible for vehicles as technologically inferior as, say, a space shuttle to have something as advanced as an extendable arm with a camera.



Well I don't know about the moon car, but it's too small to be seen anyway, and the moon is fairly big y'know, so pinpointing the exact spot they landed at before would be a task. As for a feather and a rock; the feather would certainly have burned up, and the moon is made of rocks.

NASA will have the location of the lading point an if they say we lost it, just shows another reason why they lied.

[Bibliophobia]

in a quick answer;
probably not

[Isaac]

Think about when we did this. This was during the lunar race between Russia and America. If Americans did fake the landing on the moon, the russians would be the first to find out and expose it. This would have been discovered WAY long ago if it was a hoax, but it wasn't. The russians tried, but evidence stacked up way too tall for the moon landing to be disproved.

[Procyon]

Maybe you should, you'd learn something.

Also the flag, footprints etc from the visit wouldn't be visible as they'd have been destroyed in the blasts from takeoff.

Did you get an A* in astronomy? No, don't speak.

[Colin-Roberts]

so the well documented Appollo missions they faked all them too? like appollo 13 where they flew around the moon but didn't have enough oxygen due to problems to land on the moon yet again.

[Procyon]

Yeah because it's impossible for vehicles as technologically inferior as, say, a space shuttle to have something as advanced as an extendable arm with a camera.



Well I don't know about the moon car, but it's too small to be seen anyway, and the moon is fairly big y'know, so pinpointing the exact spot they landed at before would be a task. As for a feather and a rock; the feather would certainly have burned up, and the moon is made of rocks.

Again, a load of crap. The moon car will ONLY work in space, it's foldable aswell. The people who landed on the moon were ex USAF pilots, they knew what they were doing, the feather would have NEVER burnt up because of the fact there is NO OXYGEN! Fire needs oxygen, there is no oxygen in space. The moon isn't solely made of rocks. Also, the moon is VERY small in comparsion to anything else in space, except of course for brown dwarfs as such!


The flag was waving, because of the fact metal was put into the flag to make it have the almost cliche look of any flag.