God?

[Corey777]

im afriod you have the incorect idea of teh word meaning, as im to lazy toi explain see here http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=adultery

The orignal bible has been rewritten 3 times, and thats only the old testiment.
The currnat biblke is acatly teh 2nd rewrite, wich is why it comtains so many flaws.
The orgoianl bibel was writen by 4 seperat people (none of them mosis), eaxh with the own inptrtion. each had diffenrt idea,s in oen god can communtcate directy wit hpeople, anther he cannot, and must use a go bewtween (burning bush story) . the have difent elimnts and ofcus on diffent aspects.

No modern day relisgo nactaly follows the real bible (writeen in i think arobic)

Ahh, so I have the wrong interperation on one of the meenings, my mistake.

Actually the bible we read today still does not contain a writer Moses. Someone wrote about the subject.
I do not see how 4 people wrote MANY different bookes from Genises to Revolations.

And, if you dont mind me asking, how do you know what information was in the original bible or not. Do you perhaps own a copy?

Also, why was it rewritten so many times?

[Mentor]

mainly i have to mush free time.
wich leads to watching far to many documnetrys, and resericng things for no logcal reason. plus laot of the bible reweite info comes from "who wrote the bible" wich added alot to it.
the orignal was writen to display religso veiws
the 2nd was wrietn to unte the reigos factions, and used as propagned, after tehy were inaved and lost ther land it was rewitne agn to exsplain this, by saying god had let it happen, as they must suffer and persiove to get in to hevern.

the new testiment was writen in note form, mainly in letters by 3 people none disples, and was about 40 years afetr jesus suposd death. the bist were then put togers by powerful men of god, who picked and chose what tehy wnated, they removed parts writen by woman as they did not liek teh idea of equlty, even thogh the woman was acatly one of teh real disples, apprntly, tehy also balnkedn teh anme by confuisng her with anotehr chariter, who was a protitute, it was thsiw rite who was cahneg to teh mary who first saw jesus when he left his toum afetr being dead.
it was edietd to giev them more power mainly. tehy al;so added the last part to the bible, forgot exsatly, but it bas;ly sums up o if anyoen amkes any more cahnegs tehy will suffer gods wrath

(the finaly rewrite (dead see scrolls) are not commonly used en thog hthey iron out many bugs in the old testimnt )

[Corey777]

mainly i have to mush free time.
wich leads to watching far to many documnetrys, and resericng things for no logcal reason. plus laot of the bible reweite info comes from "who wrote the bible" wich added alot to it.
the orignal was writen to display religso veiws
the 2nd was wrietn to unte the reigos factions, and used as propagned, after tehy were inaved and lost ther land it was rewitne agn to exsplain this, by saying god had let it happen, as they must suffer and persiove to get in to hevern.

the new testiment was writen in note form, mainly in letters by 3 people none disples, and was about 40 years afetr jesus suposd death. the bist were then put togers by powerful men of god, who picked and chose what tehy wnated, they removed parts writen by woman as they did not liek teh idea of equlty, even thogh the woman was acatly one of teh real disples, apprntly, tehy also balnkedn teh anme by confuisng her with anotehr chariter, who was a protitute, it was thsiw rite who was cahneg to teh mary who first saw jesus when he left his toum afetr being dead.
it was edietd to giev them more power mainly. tehy al;so added the last part to the bible, forgot exsatly, but it bas;ly sums up o if anyoen amkes any more cahnegs tehy will suffer gods wrath

(the finaly rewrite (dead see scrolls) are not commonly used en thog hthey iron out many bugs in the old testimnt )

Very interesting,

Perhaps the rewrites werre containing information that was left out?

Also, if things were left out, why are they happening today?

Example: In Revalations, it states that near the end times of the world, major weather catastrophes will happen. Florida Floods, Tsunamis, earthquakes.

It also says that there will be a world leader. This leader wil give everyone mark on their forehead or hand. This will be used much liek a debit card. Anyone who does not recieve this mark will not be able to buy or sell.

Anyone who does recive the mark will not enter the kingdom of heaven. I believe this will happen, Very soon.

It seems as if things in the bible are comign true and there will be an end to things very shortly.

[Mentor]

If the bible is making thats prediction acredtly, that threrfor denys the exisace of freewill. without freewill life is pointless, and with freewill i can say id rather die than not have it.
ANyway the bibles prediction is open.

I predict sometime in the near future it will rain.

And statsitly that will be right, as ist open, it has no pasifc dates, and sasy somthing thats bound to evntaly occur

[Corey777]

No, freewill would exist. No matter what, people can choose. The bible in my opinion is just telling what mankind will choose and what will happen to the planet.

If you read the book of revalations it can be quite frightening.

But, as it also says, be not afraid if you are under the hand of God.

The bible does give some type of time. It says, "In the generation that Israel becomes a nation, I wikll come again." I believe Israel became a nation somewhere in the 50's,60's, or 70's, But I don't have an exact date,

[Corey777]

Ahh, Sorry, ment to click edit,.

Please delete this post.

[Mentor]

If a prdiction is amde about the future, it means there cant be freewill, becuse it says its going to happen, if there were freewill ther would be no gartenes if it knows what we will choose alredy then we dont have a choise.

Athogh if the world does end, i bet bush will be the cause of it. he fits in perfectly with most profiys of the end of the world.

[Corey777]

I somewhat disagree with you.

We still have the right and freewill to change what the bible does say.

But, it is telling us that we won't.

We can change it, but in the end we will end up doing what the bible says.

So, there is freewill, but the bible tells us that we will choose to do what it says.

[Mentor]

Then we dont have freewill, if we had freewill we would be abel to choose wether or not what the bible says comes true, if were going to choose a predired choise, thats means we dont have a chose, as were simply being told what to think, and taht we cant digree as we woulnt have free will in that senriao, without freewill life is meaingless.

[Corey777]

Then we dont have freewill, if we had freewill we would be abel to choose wether or not what the bible says comes true, if were going to choose a predired choise, thats means we dont have a chose, as were simply being told what to think, and taht we cant digree as we woulnt have free will in that senriao, without freewill life is meaingless.

Yes, we do have freewill.
As I keep saying we CAN choose what will happen.
The bible is not telling us what to think. It is simply telling us what will eventually happen.

Example: Man believed Earth was flat. (ANOTHER flaw in science.)
The bible believed it was round.

Eventually Science came to agree with the bible.