Weekend games

[iAdam]

ah no that's your bias talking, we dominated you but didn't make many clear cut chances and paid for it (with a goal which should have been disallowed).

Aha thats funny, Considering the ref got you up our end by giving you free kicks and throw ins when they were ours.

And it's not bias, ask anyone.

why should cohens goal of been disallowed, you already had one crap decision in your favour which lead to a goal disallowed.

[Bun]

Aha thats funny, Considering the ref got you up our end by giving you free kicks and throw ins when they were ours.

And it's not bias, ask anyone.

why should cohens goal of been disallowed, you already had one crap decision in your favour which lead to a goal disallowed.

i did, i asked mates who had went there & those who heard it on the radio etc.


lita was mauled, his head was grabbed back. and there's no debate over the offside goal.

[iAdam]

I never saw that and the goal was down my end.

There is debate, How can a goal be offside if it comes off your keeper and wasn't passed in the first place.

Anyway, we won, that's all that counts, Doubled aswell.

[Browney]

There is debate, How can a goal be offside if it comes off your keeper and wasn't passed in the first place.

It's all about phases.

[Adamm]

Let's be honest though lads, who really gives two ***** about that game?

[iAdam]

Forest and 'brough fans maybe?

[AlexOC]

That phase crap is crap. It dosen't make sense, if you are offside when you get passed the ball from a team member raise the flag, if not, it should be allowed.

It's a real grey area Jim.

[Browney]

That phase crap is crap. It dosen't make sense, if you are offside when you get passed the ball from a team member raise the flag, if not, it should be allowed.

It's a real grey area Jim.

Well, in this example the player was offside when the ball was struck, it came off the keeper (he never had control) phase continues and it falls to an offside player.

[iAdam]

Which is just stupid imo, if the ball is kicked against a player from the opposite team and it goes out, then posession changes, possesion changed when the keeper touched it, then wilson just tapped it in. Never should of been offside.

[Browney]

Which is just stupid imo, if the ball is kicked against a player from the opposite team and it goes out, then posession changes, possesion changed when the keeper touched it, then wilson just tapped it in. Never should of been offside.

If the keeper controlled the ball, then your striker steeled in and nicked the ball away and out of his feet, I'd agree. But, the phase never stopped after the ball was kicked, the team of the kicker remains in possession, after the ball was never controlled by an opposing team member.