Weed

[Glen Coco]

because you've seen one thing of me i can now be compared to widespread hatred? great.
in no way do i promote racism and this is NOTHING like that.
i am not 'wrong' because what i have said is from personal viewpoint, i'm not saying that i'm right, or trying to force people to think the way in which i am; yet i'm not also going to back down because you've thrown a load of 'facts' together.
your ganging up and calling me 'disgusting' isn't exactly fair. like i said, my view is from personal experience and not based on facts.
you have your view, whether that's personal or from research, and i have mine.
build a bridge and get over it.

[Judas]

because you've seen one thing of me i can now be compared to widespread hatred? great.
in no way do i promote racism and this is NOTHING like that.
i am not 'wrong' because what i have said is from personal viewpoint, i'm not saying that i'm right, or trying to force people to think the way in which i am; yet i'm not also going to back down because you've thrown a load of 'facts' together.
your ganging up and calling me 'disgusting' isn't exactly fair. like i said, my view is from personal experience and not based on facts.
you have your view, whether that's personal or from research, and i have mine.
build a bridge and get over it.

So if someone came up to you and said, for example, "all blacks should be brutally murdered because they are all violent scum" because he had a "personal experience" where a black person attacked him, you'd find that acceptable because it's just his opinion? Even though it is a fact (no need for speech marks, they're facts whatever way you slice it) that not all black men would be out to harm him? Obviously that's an exaggerated case of the mindset you're using here, but the principle is there.

[Glen Coco]

So if someone came up to you and said, for example, "all blacks should be brutally murdered because they are all violent scum" because he had a "personal experience" where a black person attacked him, you'd find that acceptable because it's just his opinion? Even though it is a fact (no need for speech marks, they're facts whatever way you slice it) that not all black men would be out to harm him? Obviously that's an exaggerated case of the mindset you're using here, but the principle is there.

that is completely different!
that is being offensive and unreasonable.
no, that is not the 'mindset' that i am using and you are being ridiculous.

[Judas]

that is completely different!
that is being offensive and unreasonable.
no, that is not the 'mindset' that i am using and you are being ridiculous.

It's not really though, is it? You're basing your opinion solely on limited personal experience and refuse to take in hard facts for reasons which escape me, that's also unreasonable. It's an exaggerated situation but it's the same concept.

[OllzIsTasty]

I smoke the ganja on special occasions which is like once a month.

[Glen Coco]

It's not really though, is it? You're basing your opinion solely on limited personal experience and refuse to take in hard facts for reasons which escape me, that's also unreasonable. It's an exaggerated situation but it's the same concept.

but it's completley not!
i'm not 'refusing to take in hard facts'

i know the facts of weed and that it is supposedly not addictive or harmful but realistically it can be. yes, my opinions are based on personal opinion but i'm not ignoring the facts and i'm not stupid.
and this is nothing like racism.
you can't also base everything you think upon facts and research; it's like saying that everyone's evil because of the results on Stanley Milgram's study, so is that entirely true and should everyone stand against that?

[Judas]

but it's completley not!
i'm not 'refusing to take in hard facts'

i know the facts of weed and that it is supposedly not addictive or harmful but realistically it can be. yes, my opinions are based on personal opinion but i'm not ignoring the facts and i'm not stupid.
and this is nothing like racism.

:rolleyes:

Look up the definition of fact bbe, there's no supposedly about it.

In fact, let me do it for you. "A thing that is indisputably the case." Synonyms: reality - deed - actuality - truth - case - circumstance

I hope you understand better now

you can't also base everything you think upon facts and research; it's like saying that everyone's evil because of the results on Stanley Milgram's study, so is that entirely true and should everyone stand against that?

Oh yes, why should we not believe concrete scientific evidence? It would be so ridiculous that we should bring up such FACTS (that cannot be disproven, see above) in a debate about something that calls on scientific research for a decision to be made. I'm sure many heroin users think that heroin is FAB, so let's trust their opinion of it, because OBVIOUSLY the facts don't matter.

[Glen Coco]

:rolleyes:

Look up the definition of fact bbe, there's no supposedly about it.

In fact, let me do it for you. "A thing that is indisputably the case." Synonyms: reality - deed - actuality - truth - case - circumstance

I hope you understand better now



Oh yes, why should we not believe concrete scientific evidence? It would be so ridiculous that we should bring up such FACTS (that cannot be disproven, see above) in a debate about something that calls on scientific research for a decision to be made. I'm sure many heroin users think that meth is FAB, so let's trust their opinion of it, because OBVIOUSLY the facts don't matter.

actually, seeing a you're so factual about weed you'd know it's not physically addictive but is psychologically addictive.
don't treat me like i'm stupid 'bbe'.
so you're saying every human being is evil because a small, un-generalisable sample of the US population would follow instruction from an authoritative figure. right, ok. makes so much sense right?


edit:
i actually said 'the facts AND it is supposedly not addictive, ect.'
sugeesting that i know facts about marijuana AAAANNNDDDDD the 'it is supposedly not addictive' suggested that i knew myths about it.

thanks, smart ass.

[Judas]

actually, seeing a you're so factual about weed you'd know it's not physically addictive but is psychologically addictive.
don't treat me like i'm stupid 'bbe'.
so you're saying every human being is evil because a small, un-generalisable sample of the US population would follow instruction from an authoritative figure. right, ok. makes so much sense right?


edit:
i actually said 'the facts AND it is supposedly not addictive, ect.'
sugeesting that i know facts about marijuana AAAANNNDDDDD the 'it is supposedly not addictive' suggested that i knew myths about it.

thanks, smart ass.

Psychologically addictive? Just like ANYTHING could be? CAFFEINE is more addictive than weed.

And no, I'm not. You're saying weed is bad and should be illegal because a small, un-generalisable sample of people you know allowed weed to take over their lives. right, ok. makes so much sense right? < you've just put a major flaw in your argument there by using that example

The way you keep resorting to personal insults is very telling, though. Keep trying it

[Glen Coco]

Psychologically addictive? Just like ANYTHING could be? CAFFEINE is more addictive than weed.

And no, I'm not. You're saying weed is bad and should be illegal because a small, un-generalisable sample of people you know allowed weed to take over their lives. right, ok. makes so much sense right? < you've just put a major flaw in your argument there by using that example

The way you keep resorting to personal insults is very telling, though. Keep trying it

i don't think you can talk about posting 'personal insults' as that's what you've been doing constantly. thanks.

and yes, i'm saying it should be illegal or be controlled.

what's wrong with saying it can be addictive, as it can and IT'S BEEN PROVEN. holy crap you're trying to pick up every little thing and turn it into an argument. pretty pathetic actually.