Reputation vs Like/Thanks system?

[FlyingJesus]

That happens when you're part of a 'rep crew' in previous years, reppin' one another repeatedly to boost rep power :-)

That literally never happened lol (or else everyone I've ever liked would have the same rep) but definitely would with an unmoderated unlimited like system

Okay so I voted the second option but notice I'm the only one to do so. I guess I misunderstood the phrasing but I don't want to reduce power, I want to remove it entirely and mould the current system into one akin to likes with less of the drawbacks of introducing an entirel new system

I took that option to mean changing the rep power requirements like was done before

I can't see the huge flaws? But yeah, it would probably be best to have an official poll with two options (like vs rep) with a link to the advantages of both - although I think a like system would have few complaints IF rep count is transferred.

- The history issue is not existent - rep count is not removed, and that is the only true representation.

What were the other issues, and I'll check those too

Mostly the issue of it being massively open to abuse. If it's not limited then it would take what 20 minutes of someone's time to go through someone else's entire post history and like them all, turning it into a completely pointless system that means nothing other than "I have a friend". The opposite could also be done with extreme ease, and if people one member of management had such an issue with displaying minus reps on posts because it would look negative, imagine what a count of -15,000 would look like if it is limited and moderated, it's just the rep system as we have it except nuking rep power, which then makes it literally impossible for anyone to get anywhere near the higher levels

[The Don]

idk I'm all for polls but can see the massive flaw in polls..

something major that's going to have an impact on the forum deserves discussion but it's effecting the forum managements ability to do their job (because they're constantly having to deal with pointless rep etc reports) then something obviously needs done, whether that's disable rep or remove the system and replace with a like system it's up to wispur.

There's less active users now than ever meaning a lower workload.

[scottish]

There's less active users now than ever meaning a lower workload.

Not necessarily.

But even lower workload doesn't mean it's not too much for them to cope with other duties (especially as everyone's older = more responsibilities out with habbo(x) so less time to spend on habbo(x))

[MKR&*42]

Okay what is this rep count nonsense on my postbit?

someone direct me to a post in this thread (i assume was this thread) where it was discussed?

or has it been there longer than this evening...

[Chippiewill]

There's less active users now than ever meaning a lower workload.

Less active users means users are more ****** than ever.

- - - Updated - - -

Okay what is this rep count nonsense on my postbit?

someone direct me to a post in this thread (i assume was this thread) where it was discussed?

or has it been there longer than this evening...

It's been there for about two months.

[Kyle]

Okay what is this rep count nonsense on my postbit?

someone direct me to a post in this thread (i assume was this thread) where it was discussed?

or has it been there longer than this evening...

It's been there forever what u on about what is the issue with it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[MKR&*42]

Less active users means users are more ****** than ever.

- - - Updated - - -



It's been there for about two months.

I HAVE A FEELING IM BEING TRICKED

im not fooling for this

...falling*

[Kardan]

It has literally been there for ages

[AgnesIO]

Okay what is this rep count nonsense on my postbit?

someone direct me to a post in this thread (i assume was this thread) where it was discussed?

or has it been there longer than this evening...

A) it has been there for months
B) It is effectively how a like system would look anyway. Works well, right?

[Inseriousity.]

I'm confused. The like system is apparently about being less negative but they also want a public display of who liked who? So if there's a debate and my posts are liked, it is telling everyone who disagrees with me who disagrees with them? Isn't this going to be a more negative system?

Personally, I like that rep isn't a one-click system. Makes it mean more if someone has to go to some effort to give it. On Facebook, it's all about fishing for likes. The rep system is more understated.