Can moderating just stay as it is

[xxMATTGxx]

Relax, it's a forum. People are on here to have a good time and enjoy it. But making pointless rules and using silly logic doesn't solve that. I'm glad it has been clarified, but there are still loopholes. For example, why can't people say it in spam if someone avoids the filter. It is after-all "Spam" and does not have a clear-cut focus.

You should take pointers from when Rosie was a mod, she was always right on the money.

I don't think anyone has said they can't say it in spam hm.

[Grig]

I don't think anyone has said they can't say it in spam hm.

Then add that to the rule. Seeing as we are being so precise now .

[xxMATTGxx]

Then add that to the rule. Seeing as we are being so precise now .

That's a specific forum rule so can be added to the rules in that specific area and not the main rules.

[Sian]

I'm going to say I know I'm going a bit backward here and the rule has been modified and clarified. But seeming as before Chris did that it said nothing about replying to a thread saying they've broken a rule, then the original point stands that it was unfair.

I'm just saying. But apart from that at least it got clarified, though honestly I don't see anything wrong with people replying like that, unless it's just done to spam.

[Samantha]

Relax, it's a forum. People are on here to have a good time and enjoy it. But making pointless rules and using silly logic doesn't solve that. I'm glad it has been clarified, but there are still loopholes. For example, why can't people say it in spam if someone avoids the filter. It is after-all "Spam" and does not have a clear-cut focus.

You should take pointers from when Rosie was a mod, she was always right on the money.

She wasn't always right but she was a great staff member.

[Grig]

She wasn't always right but she was a great staff member.

well we all have small margins for error. Some people more than others .

I was simply stating the above because it's pretty embarrassing when a super mod defends a ridiculous position.

[Chippiewill]

pretty sure you can get it done via plugin/edits though?

Not reliably, you could restrict it when editing a post but then if someone wants to change something about their post and a mod has already added a modwarn then it'll disable the modwarn. Not really needed as there's never problems with this rule anyway.

[Jack!]

That was a long read, reminds me of a thread I made about the moderating probably 6 months ago.

You ALL need to be singing from the same hymn.

And Lee, sort that attitude out, its not helping anything.

[Samantha]

Hasn't everyone been made aware of the new rule? @Jordan; Didn't seem like it when I reported a post. Had to report again more indepth to understand.
@Chris;

[Jordan]

Hasn't everyone been made aware of the new rule? @Jordan; Didn't seem like it when I reported a post. Had to report again more indepth to understand.
@Chris;

I do understand the new rule, I understood the last one too. The post you reported wasn't breaking the moderation rule because we don't tell people off for telling people that the furniture was released a few days back. In this case the furniture hasn't even been released yet.