Exactly, thats why it was good? Well fucking amazingOriginally Posted by Infrontation

Exactly, thats why it was good? Well fucking amazingOriginally Posted by Infrontation
Rofl that is because Boro never win anything :p
REMOVED
Edited by jesus (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not have text in your signature which is over size 4.
Lmao, 5-3 is hardly pwning when one of the goals was like when the goal was empty :'] lmaoo.Originally Posted by Infrontation
You still got pwned :p 5-3
Twas the keepers faultOriginally Posted by Silverstein
Lmao, 5-3 is hardly pwning when one of the goals was like when the goal was empty :'] lmaoo.
Might as well lose 5-3 instead of 4-3 going for 4-4.Originally Posted by Infrontation
Twas the keepers fault
Na the odds on the keeper actually scoring is like 200-1Originally Posted by Jordan
Might as well lose 5-3 instead of 4-3 going for 4-4.
Yeah but like, at least he was tryingOriginally Posted by Infrontation
Na the odds on the keeper actually scoring is like 200-1.
I go around giving everyone a quick snog. O_O;
Joking..
I wouldn't say I was absolutely hysterical, but I getvexcited.
jesus christ, that's a pretty face.
How is it? If he is in the box, all he has to do is head it.Originally Posted by Infrontation
Na the odds on the keeper actually scoring is like 200-1
There is like a 1 in 19 chance of him heading it. Also if he does head it he has like a 1 in 5 chance of scoring.. and with the goalkeepers heading skills .. :p
Last edited by Infrontation; 07-01-2006 at 11:15 PM.
Why would the goalkeeper be bad at heading? He is tall y'know.Originally Posted by Infrontation
There is like a 1 in 19 chance of him heading it. Also if he does head it he has like a 1 in 5 chance of scoring.. and with the goalkeepers heading skills .. :p
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!