Ok... How About This Then?

[Mentor]

Ixjust put in a geanrilsed view covering a few psoibl situtions, athogh being more persifci woudl make it eaqsyer to aruge 1 way or the other.

[Ciaran]

If they are a mental paitent they have even more chance of causing harm to you and not even know what they are doing

[SSC7]

Depends what you're talking about. The Iraq situation of course I would Shoot him.
Self defense = Right, but its still taking a humans life
Just doing it = WRONG
Accidentally = Bad, and must be terribe fo rthe perosn who did it

[GommeInc]

I wish I could vote but I cant, it is normally always wrong, that person has the right to live and no one can take it away from them without an explantation, although, thats not a good way to handle it either.

[Mentor]

But if its a deffencie sitution tehre trying to kill you, and killing them would be the only way to stop them? woudl u just let yourslef be killed?

[Ciaran]

Thats exactly my point.... i dunno what id do... killing for fu is wrong i dont even like animal killing for no reason like rabbits and fox hunting

[Lord Zero]

As all the others have stated, you need to specify in which situation is it right or wrong to kill.

Otherwise we could be here for awhile..

[xJoeYx]

mmmm... that is a very broad question, if you are refering to the war going on in Iraq think of it as utilitarianism. Although many lives have been lost, and a majority of which innocent, ultimately in the long run everyone is better off and more lives have been saved.

[Pulchritudinous]

I think thats wrong, if there was no violence, no-one would have to defend themselves...
Violence doesn't solve anything..
I know I sound like a hippy but its true...

[xJoeYx]

If only it was that easy aimee.. unfortunetly no1 is perfect and its definetly not a perfect world. Sometimes violence is the only way in some situations.