PETA IS LABELLED WRONG. **WARNING: CONTIANS GRAPHIC IMAGES**

[velvet]

A sum up of what peta does for animals

I get what you mean, but personally, i'd rather be Euthanized, than skinned alive, having my throat cut, ect.
Peta may do some bad things, but think about all the people it makes aware, every vegaterian saves approximately 92 animals a year from slaughter. If you think about all the people peta has provided information for about vegaterianism and not wearing wool/fur, then maybe the company doesn't save that many animals, but overall, the people who peta have turned vegaterian/vegan, save more animals. so really, peta is doing some good. But I don't agree with the fact that they Euthanize all those animals.

[Mentor]

I get what you mean, but personally, i'd rather be Euthanized, than skinned alive, having my throat cut, ect.
Peta may do some bad things, but think about all the poeple it makes aware, every vegaterian saves approximately 92 animals a year from slaughter. If you think about all the poeple peta has provided information for about vegaterianism and not wearing wool/fur, then maybe the company doesn't save that many animals, but overall, the people who peta have turned vegaterian/vegan, save more animals. so really, peta is doing some good. But I don't agree with the fact that they Euthanize all those animals.

Yea, but when you take in to account the videos your watching were are stadges vidioes made by peta, not envoling real places, and actaly happening under petas OWN supervison... Then they hold less weight.

Peta spend 1% of its buget helping animals.
Kills 90%
Most the buget goes right of to terroists so they can fire bomb and murder a few other scientists trying to cure cancer...

Its all about profit, they brain wash children, take there money, get out of paying tax's...

ps. 92 animals?
Well peta seems to be trying to pick up the slack.

I dont agree even with real and honest animal rights activits in princable, Peta thogh i hate as they only pretend to be animal rights, and insted murder them in the 1000's

[ilovejordan]

Sorry but i would like proof of what your saying mentor

[velvet]

Yea, but when you take in to account the videos your watching were are stadges vidioes made by peta, not envoling real places, and actaly happening under petas OWN supervison... Then they hold less weight.

Peta spend 1% of its buget helping animals.
Kills 90%
Most the buget goes right of to terroists so they can fire bomb and murder a few other scientists trying to cure cancer...

Its all about profit, they brain wash children, take there money, get out of paying tax's...

If that is true, I suppose, but do you have any evidence they are staged?
And even if they are, it still has an impact on people watching.

[Mentor]

Sorry but i would like proof of what your saying mentor

if you followed the links youd find it..

A few links to news sites maybe?
http://www.wvec.com/news/local/stori....4008bc72.html
http://www.vancnews.com/articles/200...ews/news07.txt
http://www.petakillsanimals.com/pres...ail.cfm?id=148
http://www.roanoke-chowannewsherald....news/news2.txt
http://www.wnct.com/servlet/Satellit...783337916&path
http://www.consumerfreedom.com/artic...fm/article/156
http://www.activistcash.com/organiza...iew.cfm/oid/21
http://www.animalscam.com/

[velvet]

if you followed the links youd find it..

A few links to news sites maybe?
http://www.wvec.com/news/local/stori....4008bc72.html
http://www.vancnews.com/articles/200...ews/news07.txt
http://www.petakillsanimals.com/pres...ail.cfm?id=148
http://www.roanoke-chowannewsherald....news/news2.txt
http://www.wnct.com/servlet/Satellit...783337916&path
http://www.consumerfreedom.com/artic...fm/article/156
http://www.activistcash.com/organiza...iew.cfm/oid/21
http://www.animalscam.com/

But where's the proof their videos where staged..?

[Mentor]

But where's the proof their videos where staged..?

To find the persfic case i orignal would have used would requre trolling thew quite large new archvives of peta exsploits.

http://brianoconnor.typepad.com/anim...orrupting.html

im guesising from the title that artical most likly covers the subject

(im currnly to lazy, may have proper search later)

[Sammeth.]

I gotta say Im siding with 01101101entor on this. Look how many animals were killed compared to how many they killed compared to which were adopted in 2005, out of the amount they received. And whose to say they kill them fairly? In a humane way? Whats the proof in that?

[RedStratocas]

every vegaterian saves approximately 92 animals a year from slaughter.

Lets break out the ol' calculator: 92/365 = .252. If you suggest that I eat 25% of an animal every day, Ive got some suprising news... I dont. Most people dont, considering 25% is a pretty big amount.

Also, by not eating something, that doesnt mean you saved it. Meat companies dont say "This guy doesnt eat meat, we shouldnt kill this cow". Supply and demand isnt effected by one person, there is no way to measure how many animals are 'saved' by vegitarians.

[Jordan3]

Also, by not eating something, that doesnt mean you saved it. Meat companies dont say "This guy doesnt eat meat, we shouldnt kill this cow". Supply and demand isnt effected by one person, there is no way to measure how many animals are 'saved' by vegitarians.

Yeah he's right. Vegetarians don't save animals from being killed, they just stop animals being bought from shops then eaten. So the thing that misses out is supermarkets, not aninal deaths.