Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


View Poll Results: Are you for or against animal testing?

Voters
34. You may not vote on this poll
  • For

    6 17.65%
  • Against

    25 73.53%
  • Ambiguous

    3 8.82%
Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 75

Thread: Animal testing

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    733
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Virgin Mary
    Are you for or against animal testing? I'm against it, especially when it's for cosmetics etc. They should get humans volunteers to do it, or do tests on people who are on death row, you can't really say they've got much to look forward to in life.
    I'm against animal testing when it comes to cosmetics where alternatives could be used. However, to a certain degree I don't totally disregard animal testing for medical research. Testing things on humans is never a good idea and seems like a bizarre thing to do. I remember reading a case about voluntary humans getting tested on and it wasn't good.
    i don't play habbo anymore.
    Asher 00006772
    msg me if you need me.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Nazareth
    Posts
    3,547
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by asher_
    I'm against animal testing when it comes to cosmetics where alternatives could be used. However, to a certain degree I don't totally disregard animal testing for medical research. Testing things on humans is never a good idea and seems like a bizarre thing to do. I remember reading a case about voluntary humans getting tested on and it wasn't good.
    Testing things on humans FOR humans is the best available option. Something will have much different effects on a lab rodent than it will on a human. People who volunteer do it knowing the possibile risk of such an outcome.

  3. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Virgin Mary
    Something will have much different effects on a lab rodent than it will on a human.
    But wouldn't you have preferred to have had an idea about the drug you were testing on a human first. If you give a drug to a rat and the rat dies, the chances are that if you give it to a human the human will die too. Cosmetics is a big no, but medically I think it is needed. The animals are bred for it, they don't know any different, think of the outrage if they came along and took your pet for testing.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Nazareth
    Posts
    3,547
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lolerskates
    But wouldn't you have preferred to have had an idea about the drug you were testing on a human first. If you give a drug to a rat and the rat dies, the chances are that if you give it to a human the human will die too. Cosmetics is a big no, but medically I think it is needed. The animals are bred for it, they don't know any different, think of the outrage if they came along and took your pet for testing.
    Well, like I said, test it on those on death row. Maybe they should start breeding humans for it.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    9,646
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    What does ambiguous mean?

  6. #16

    Default

    There are not enough people on death row to test. Only a handful of executions are carried out in the western world every year. Also it takes longer to create and raise a human baby as opposed to a litter of rats

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    733
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    I just wish the scientists actually gave a damn about animal welfare and atleast tried to give them some form of a life prior to testing, instead of breeding dozens of rabbits, simply for testing things such as cosmetics.
    Last edited by asher_; 24-07-2006 at 11:28 AM.
    i don't play habbo anymore.
    Asher 00006772
    msg me if you need me.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Nazareth
    Posts
    3,547
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cassie.
    What does ambiguous mean?
    Like if you think that testing for cosmetics is wrong but for medical reasons it's okay.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,722
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Virgin Mary
    Like if you think that testing for cosmetics is wrong but for medical reasons it's okay.
    Oh damn, I should have voted that really. I thoguht it means you don't have an opinion :rolleyes:

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Nazareth
    Posts
    3,547
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:


Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •