Signatures

[Dave,]

also why should there be more work for the mods, we do ALOT as it is, mayb you dont notice it but we do. why cant you just be happy that people are here trying to help keep you safe?

I meant new mods for inspecting the new sigs. Also it isn't that hard to be a mod, I am one on many other forums. Also most mods don't even know the rules.

[Crying-Angel]

well i aint most mods and i do work hard to fit all this in around my as-levels.

[Max]

I have no idea what you mean with staying safe, and why should I only give my pic to people I trust?
It's not like giving all my personal details..

But whatever you want.

[Buggy]

pictures can also be hard to moderate, just think what sort of things could end up on here (and it would be everywhere until a mod or admin see it), this is supposed to be a safe site for everyone we should keep it that way.

People arent that stupid, it's very unlikely that anyone would have anything like that, and not everyone would end up using images in signatures anyway.

And moderating signatures isnt a big job, and doesnt need to be treated that way. Your browsing forums and stuff anyway, any signatures that are against the rules would be pretty easy to see, and then easy to remove.

[Cloudclone]

Just read my thread in this forum. >_>

. People can report bad images.
. People looking at thread can see images (So not hard to miss)
. You assume that people are going to put offensive images in their signatures... Thats a bit wrong isn't it. ¬¬

[scottish]

It Would Cause A Bit Of Lag, Also People Wil Just abuse it By putting about 20 Pics in then it Would Probably Crash, And People Just Put Stuff Like to try and annoy habbox if you know what i mean :|

[Dave,]

It Would Cause A Bit Of Lag, Also People Wil Just abuse it By putting about 20 Pics in then it Would Probably Crash, And People Just Put Stuff Like to try and annoy habbox if you know what i mean :|

It wouldn't lag anything.

[Buggy]

It Would Cause A Bit Of Lag, Also People Wil Just abuse it By putting about 20 Pics in then it Would Probably Crash, And People Just Put Stuff Like to try and annoy habbox if you know what i mean :|

actually i doubt 20 pics would fit in it. We still have maximum lengths. Also, a forum isnt going to lag, the server wouldnt lag, nothing would lag. Signatures wouldnt be uploaded here, they would be hosted somewhere else, so its not going on this server, and not being download from this server. Page loading times wouldn't really be affected either, because the script is run before the imag is downloaded, so once all the posts in a thread have shown up you can just hit stop if you dont want to load

[Cloudclone]

Simple, 150 character limit to signatures. (Only linked images) and limit them to 1 (or 2 images) per user.

And again; no lag would be there.

[sierk1]

When we allow images in signatures people can use huge moving images, that would be very annoying. I don't think we can limit the size of an image used in a signature.

And what do you consider the normal dimensions for an avatar picture used on other forums?