Naming Scammers Campaign

[deagle]

I believe we should be able to name scammers.

Were aloud to say 'Trusted', why aren't we aloud to say 'Not-trusted' o.O

It doesn't make any sense.

I support 100%!

Cause thats either spam (Your neutral), or your saying they are not to be trusted with trades (indicating they scam).

And Cwmbran, if you hate someone, you'll definatly mod it. Say, you hate this newbie who keeps spamming. Wouldnt you do it to make more people hate him?

[sBosma]

Well then wouldn't saying 'trusted' be spam aswell? People saying trusted should have proof showing they are trusted if people need proof to say their not trusted.

Its the EXCACT same thing except your adding a 'not' infront of 'trusted'. Your just warning everyone that you did a trade with him and it wasn't successful.

[Cwmbran]

And Cwmbran, if you hate someone, you'll definatly mod it. Say, you hate this newbie who keeps spamming. Wouldnt you do it to make more people hate him?

I my self would not, but some people may.

Alternative "symbol" to put in your sig made by Hoody

[Ramones]

Cause thats either spam (Your neutral), or your saying they are not to be trusted with trades (indicating they scam).

And Cwmbran, if you hate someone, you'll definatly mod it. Say, you hate this newbie who keeps spamming. Wouldnt you do it to make more people hate him?

god is somebody abit paranoid about it? I think it's a good idea if there is proof. And if somebody really could be bothered to edit a video i think it would be pretty obvious they had done.

[despute]

I support. +Rep.

[Ashley]

I tried to name a scammer, and got permentantly banned, infracted and fired from my job.

So I suggest you just find another way of naming them Like I eventually did.

[deagle]

god is somebody abit paranoid about it? I think it's a good idea if there is proof. And if somebody really could be bothered to edit a video i think it would be pretty obvious they had done.

It all depends if you have expierence with editing videos. If your good, its easy and fast and accurate. I'm also stating what the mods will tell you. Nothing has changed their minds since.

Well then wouldn't saying 'trusted' be spam aswell? People saying trusted should have proof showing they are trusted if people need proof to say their not trusted.

Its the EXCACT same thing except your adding a 'not' infront of 'trusted'. Your just warning everyone that you did a trade with him and it wasn't successful.

Dont you understand this? Saying that someone scams is against the rules. Saying not trusted is indicating they scam.

And no its not the exact same thing. Hi and Bi is completly different, except I changed the H to a B. Now they mean completly opposite.


If you think its the exact same thing, why not say not trusted to the trusted people then? Its the exact same thing right?

[ReviewDude]

Oh goodness gracious (so many other words could have gone there) searh 'Naming Scammers' in Habbox Questions and Comments. You'll see a good dozen threads proving why allowing the naming of scammers is a bad idea.

[Cwmbran]

Oh goodness gracious (so many other words could have gone there) searh 'Naming Scammers' in Habbox Questions and Comments. You'll see a good dozen threads proving why allowing the naming of scammers is a bad idea.

I know, I made a thread on it.
I know exactly why we should not name them and I disagree with it.

You can not say that if we named scammers then it would not benefit the forum community.

[T0M]

Review - If a majority of the runescape forum believe it to be a good idea though, surely there could be a trial just in this section, and depending how it turns out, go on from there?

Also review, peoples opinions are changing atm, so just saying about the old threads made doesnt help. 'Progress only happens if people let it ' =)