Kerrang or NME?

[samsaBEAR]

kerrnag! talks about rubbish music most of the time. nme talk about good music most of the time but they are such lazy journalists and bum every next big thing so badly which gets tiresome after a while.

if i had to choose i would go for nme i suppose.

yeh, the thing with nme is when they think they've found a band thats gonna be huge, they always somehow find ways of slipping them into every article. they did it with arctic monkeys, and im sure they'll find a new band to promote as heavily as they have in the past.
i personally prefer kerrang coz it covers music i like :p

[YoManGo!]

they both suck reallly hard.

[summer]

yeah but it's not like nme jump on bandwagons really, they generally launch bands popularity (for instance klaxons, and right now the twang)

[Seren]

Never bought an NME mag, so Kerrang!.

[louder]

i used to read kerrang!, but now i think it's a load of crap.
i sometimes read nme at break or lunch with my friend who buys it tho.

[Tash.]

I buy NME most weeks.. and Kerrang I just get if I like the look of who's on the cover.

[splatttt]

i only really buy kerrang because thats the music i listen to
like what sam said reaally
NME is alright, but i got bored 2 pages in

[English]

I sometimes buy both mags. Depends who's featured really, although I'll usually tend to buy Kerrang instead of NME if I just get one. I must admit Kerrang show a lot of bands regularly, but if they are the "in" bands then they will feature them in their mag so that the magazine sells - meaning they can make more profits to continue the magazine/television etc. However NME also often features a lot of the same bands. But they're both good mags.

[samsaBEAR]

i do like the letters nme get tho. they are alot funnier then the ones kerrang! get.

[chilloutrich]

im a kerrang man