Bring Back the Trusted List!

[Redmoon Evil]

No. this guy scammed me then2 weeks later he was on the list.

[BobX]

Fair points. There are obviously downsides and upsides to bringing the list back, hopefully this thread will shine some light n the both

Wow thats cheesey

[Sly]

Naw make a scammers list then i got more chance of getting on it.

[DJ-Vimto]

i think it should be brought back.

with the requirements being made stricter as some people have mentioned.

[Elkaa]

Naw make a scammers list then i got more chance of getting on it.

Will never happen.

--

As for the thread, I like the idea of a trusted list. How you would get onto it would need to be thought out VERY well for it to work, though. People who are not on the list could also end up being excluded from trades simply because they are not on the list.

Would you trust someone not on the list?

How would they get into the list, in order to gain the trust, if they're not trusted?

[Cwmbran]

Will never happen.

--

As for the thread, I like the idea of a trusted list. How you would get onto it would need to be thought out VERY well for it to work, though. People who are not on the list could also end up being excluded from trades simply because they are not on the list.

Would you trust someone not on the list?

How would they get into the list, in order to gain the trust, if they're not trusted?

There was a trusted list before, and I believe a while ago there was also a scammers list? Anyway, I believe it hasn't been deleted so if you search the trading section for it then it could give you some ideas on how to improve it?

[Actor]

Yeah, it still exists however it isn't stickied

[salacious]

There should be a trading list, with people who do trades often, with evidence of successful and unsuccessful trades.

a diagram of my idea:

[Username]

successful trades, no proof;
successful trades, with proof;
unsuccessful trades, no proof;
unsuccessful trades, with proof;

The evidence would have to be PMed to a moderator and they would deem whether or not it can be accepted as evidence.

Just a thought.

[[Jay]]

No point not only will its a waste of time someone can easily get on there by doing some trades and not scamming w/e then they will used the advantage of being on trusted list to scam which is usually a big scam like throne or a few mill etc...
Just leave it the way it is.....if you dont feal safe trading someone dont i know there is some sad people out there who like to scam pixels but thats life.

[BobX]

Thanks for thought everyone perhaps if like someone high up like mad or wvr reads it he could think of something.

meh

or something.

k
x

Edit:

@[Jay] Yes but if you look in the runescape section, all you see is "Is __ trusted?" this then leads to people saying no and getting infracted.