sierk finally replied to on of my pm's 2/3 weeks late..
He said along the lines of;
that they will try to get a untrusted list going.

sierk finally replied to on of my pm's 2/3 weeks late..
He said along the lines of;
that they will try to get a untrusted list going.
(゚Д゚≡゚Д゚)
Roy: [singing] We don't need no education.
Moss: Yes you do; you've just used a double negative
Nah don't ban account trading, its at your risk, we now have a unsafe list so people in away are being named thanks to my request *Bows* so don't ban it you do it at your own risk.
Thanks
Duno i agree too ..
Watch Scrubs on Paramountits gd
Nothing to do with "giving into pressure". We simply felt we had to find a work around since it seems scamming was high even though we did say (and will continue to say) any trades that are done, are done at your own risk and the end result is 100% your responsibility.
This list will be run by the forum members but updated by youheard.
The main reason we do not allowed people to name scammers is because of the arguments it causes. Since members have to PM youheard, arguments will not start between members (or are less likely to).
Last edited by ---MAD---; 12-07-2007 at 02:29 AM.
---MAD---
Nothing to do with "giving into pressure". We simply felt we had to find a work around since it seems scamming was high even though we did say (and will continue to say) any trades that are done, are done at your own risk and the end result is 100% your responsibility.
This list will be run by the forum members but updated by youheard.
The main reason we do not allowed people to name scammers is because of the arguments it causes. Since members have to PM youheard, arguments will not start between members (or are less likely to).Cool
![]()
Posts1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2250 2500 2750 3000
Rep Counter
900 910 920 930 940 950 960 970
980 990 1000
Vouches
[X]
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!