Good moderators.

[Yoshimitsui]

You can be infracted for pointless posting.

Post such as 'ssbadbsad' or 'Hi' or none relevant one word comments are to be dealt with. Even though it's a spam section, it's not an lets just post randomly and for the beans of it forum.


And you don't actually know wether the post was infracted or not do you! You can only see the edit, just becuase there is an edit does not mean there is always an infraction or warning.

[Mr.OSH]

You can be infracted for pointless posting.

Post such as 'ssbadbsad' or 'Hi' or none relevant one word comments are to be dealt with. Even though it's a spam section, it's not an lets just post randomly and for the beans of it forum.


And you don't actually know wether the post was infracted or not do you! You can only see the edit, just becuase there is an edit does not mean there is always an infraction or warning.

I can confirm that the only infractions that were distributed during that thread were infractions for bulling, inappropriate language and insulting forum members.

[jackass]

by any chance do you mean biogeneric? he seems to hate mods and everyone else. i don't think they'd be mods if they were crap tbh.

What planet are you from?

I don't hate mods and everyone else, what the hell?

I am a mod on HabboxWorld...

[Elkaa]

Nothing wrong with Jay. We all get this kind of slander, something you need to get used too.

[---MAD---]

i swear i saw him infract someone for pointless posting in the spam forum.

There is no infraction for pointless posting. I removed that months ago as it was far too harsh. We do ban people if they constantly do it though as they just takes threads off topic and gets very annoying for users who are contributing to a thread.

You can be infracted for pointless posting.

Post such as 'ssbadbsad' or 'Hi' or none relevant one word comments are to be dealt with. Even though it's a spam section, it's not an lets just post randomly and for the beans of it forum.


And you don't actually know wether the post was infracted or not do you! You can only see the edit, just becuase there is an edit does not mean there is always an infraction or warning.

I think he meant can't.

Nothing wrong with Jay. We all get this kind of slander, something you need to get used too.

Indeed. I think mods / smods / admins are attacked the most because users usually deny they broke the rules. Obviously we all mistakes which is why we have a thread were users can report unfair / incorrect infractions which can be reversed .

I do think this forum has improved though moderating wise. Before you would get a thread about a moderator's action like every week, now it is very rare and that may be because of the new systems in place or because of the mods hired, or off course both.

Smods check every single infraction given out. Smods check other smods infractions (they do not check their own for obvious reasons) which does increase the speed that an unfair infraction is reversed.

Obviously new moderators have a lot to learn so they may make quite a few mistakes at the start until they get a hang of things .

Moderators have improved a lot on this forum I believe and I hope people agree with this as well (I am not saying this just cause I am the forum manager). I truely do believe the systems in places are helping decrease harshness and increase awareness from moderators and I hope you do too .

[shiver]

I can confirm that the only infractions that were distributed during that thread were infractions for bulling, inappropriate language and insulting forum members.

you gave one to rafiki for 'pointless posting' - in the spam forum? well, you're a bit of an idiot, aren't you!

thanks for aiming this thread at me by the way, in my opinion he's a bit of a moronic moderator. get over it already.

[Mr.OSH]

you gave one to rafiki for 'pointless posting' - in the spam forum? well, you're a bit of an idiot, aren't you!

thanks for aiming this thread at me by the way, in my opinion he's a bit of a moronic moderator. get over it already.

As already said, there is no infraction for pointless posting therefore there is no way I could have possibly given out an infraction for pointless posting.

[shiver]

As already said, there is no infraction for pointless posting therefore there is no way I could have possibly given out an infraction for pointless posting.

well u still edited sum1s post with "dont post pointlessly" so ye lol.. admit it

[Earthquake.]

Just report it, don't say it. Moderators do have feelings you know..

[Mr.OSH]

well u still edited sum1s post with "dont post pointlessly" so ye lol.. admit it

I did edit someone's post as I felt it was completely pointless just "=D,=D" etc. Maybe I was wrong about that, I will be more careful when I look at pointless posting in the spam forum in the future. Sorry, if I caused any issues with that but at the end of the day it was simply a moderator edit so from the users point of view it is not something to be worried about and is not recorded against them in anyway, its just a way of reminding people they broke a rule.