Hang on, are the brackets there just to show that it's g(t²) and not (gt)²? If so, then ,Jess,'s answer is correct:
g(t²) = -68
t² = -68/g
t = ±√(-68/g)

Hang on, are the brackets there just to show that it's g(t²) and not (gt)²? If so, then ,Jess,'s answer is correct:
g(t²) = -68
t² = -68/g
t = ±√(-68/g)
Good point. This can actually be different in context, it follows similar notation (f(x), g(x), h(x) or even A(t), usually) to functions which is why we assumed that. Given the picture, Jesus' answer is most likely correct.
(define (reduce f)((lambda (value) (if (equal? value f) f (reduce value))) (let r ((f f) (g ())) (cond ((not (pair? f)) (if (null? g) f (if (eq? f (car g)) (cadr g) (r f (caddr g))))) ((and (pair? (car f)) (= 2 (length f)) (eq? 'lambda (caar f))) (r (caddar f) (list (cadar f) (r (cadr f) g) g))) ((and (not (null? g)) (= 3 (length f)) (eq? 'lambda (car f))) (cons 'lambda (r (cdr f) (list (cadr f) (delay (cadr f)) g)))) (else (map (lambda (x) (r x g)) f))))))
so T2 x G is -63 then don't you need to find the value of G before you find the value of t?
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!