That ball WAS NOT out of play

[The Don]

i agree with http://

[Minstrels]

Yes but i think if england had been allowed it they would've pushed more because they deffo had a chance of winning

I concur.

[Geraint]

As I was saying to my dad, if your English it's a try but if your not English it isn't a try. I did actually think it was a try but video ref thought differently

[Jalt]

RSA did deserve to win. Im sure that ball out wouldn't have made much of a difference.

[Ezzie.]

The ref was an aussie/new zealander wasn't he? And it was the video analysts decision not the actual in ground referee.. though personally i think they should have given the try.. would've been a 15-15.. but =/

[CJW93]

Why keep on about it. Its over. Its not asif the referreis goingto reverse his decision

[Ezzie.]

Maybe because it was one of the crucial points in the game? And tates footwork and play was incredible..

[Samtraff]

If the try was given it would have changed the whole match. Like England would have got a boost from it. And Africans will have been a tiny bit how do I put this umm broken-ish..Well that didn't make complete sense but I understand what I mean

[Ezzie.]

I understand you sam- if i get you, you're saying that when the english were given the try their morale would've raised higher and they that could've carried them on to get them a try

[@xP]

I didn't watch it but hey.

Sounds abit weird :S
If it cost us the game then fair enough.

Bad luck for us i suppose