I think its stupid.

[Nixt]

I'm sure that if I stood over someone and shot once or twice, I'd hit them - Wouldn't take 10 shots.

Yes, but what I am saying is that he would have been killed regardless. Also, when you think about it, ten shots isn't that much; most of them would of been carrying automatic rifles and several would have shot at once.

[Mandez]

does it matter how many bullets they fired, they killed him ***.

[Alkaz]

several would have shot at once.

Yah thats what i thought.

[GommeInc]

I am sure the man who was shot because he had a chair leg didn't drop the 'weapon' because he was in shock and confusion? You can't expect someone to drop anything just by one command. The poilice are at fault for shooting him, they didn't give him enough time. They should of got him to put his arms up or at least allow more time to put the 'gun' down. At least with this man, if it was an actual gun, if he was preparing to use it you would actually be on the winning side because you're already aimed at him.

The tube accident was by accident and I still think it's the police forces fault. Who cares if he could of been a suicide bomber, that's in the past. The fact is down to reality, that he wasn't a suicide bomber and didn't have any known intentions to blow up a train. If the police wanted to solve problems like this, they should solve this themselves, with security checks and scanners. What is rediculous is that they shot him when they had no proof. The police, again, are at fault. Because an innocent man had an unjustified death.

Saying the man who had a chair leg deserved it is stupid "/ In what way did he deserve to be shot?

"I saw an Asian guy. He ran on to the train, he was hotly pursued by three plain clothes officers, one of them was wielding a black handgun.

"He half tripped... they pushed him to the floor and basically unloaded five shots into him," he told BBC News 24.

They had him on the floor... Surely they would of known if he was holding a bomb "/