Human Testing?!

[FlyingJesus]

I don't see how they will know how much of an effect it will have on humans as animals will react differently.

Aye, hence why I said to test on animals first and then humans to get the exact tests and whatever. Testing on pigs can work quite well as their body makeup is extremely similar to that of a human (as in, the proportions of water, fats, muscles etc). The only real problem is for psychological tests as animals aren't sentient like we are, but hey maybe one day you'll get lucky and they'll do some tests to find out why some people are late bedwetters.

[WarezKid]

Source?

I wanna see this human testimg ;/

[Neversoft]

They rarely try anything they're unsure about on humans? They use animals like rats and monkeys.

It's the persons choice to go and do it anyway, doesn't bother me.

[You]

They rarely try anything they're unsure about on humans? They use animals like rats and monkeys.

It's the persons choice to go and do it anyway, doesn't bother me.

Is that why you have the extra ears?

[Neversoft]

Is that why you have the extra ears?

Obviously not.

Whats the story behind your triple cheeked ass?

[WarezKid]

LMAO LMAOLOL


Sorry, but i lol;d at above

[PaulMacC]

Obviously not.

Whats the story behind your triple cheeked ass?

3rd degree burn.

[-:Undertaker:-]

Why?
That doesnt give correct results.
We should do it on humans, They can concent and give propper results.

Because animals are worthless and don't go aww but it's not fair because it is. If we didn't breed these animals for testing they would all have to be put down.

Yeah but should do it on animals first just in case there's something horribly wrong, then move onto humans for fine tuning.

I agree 100% thomas.

[Sarah]

Well, at the end of the day without testing on something we wouldnt have many drugs in the world that saves lifes without these we would be in very hot water. In a way i think they should be tested on animals befor humans because at the end of the day a animal isnt as bad a as human being dieing but then if the human is really looking for some quick cash then offering themselves to test a drug is a way to get some quick cash, so its abit like a see-saw.

[Soka]

yes

because its down to the person to make the choice, and if they want to put theirselves in a threatening situation ifor money its their choice

they have to sign a contract by law so they cannot sue the company if something goes wrong etc. also i doubt the insurances would want to pay out if you took the risk and something went wrong as you signed

although i do agree with the above, like trying on a rat or sumit first to fine it down so to speak.