Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 45
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    477
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    i dnt see why u care so much.
    is it cos u keep getting pointless -reps?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hull
    Posts
    230
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Concerning People Who... *Text Removed*

    Recieved that -rep from a individual just lost a bar EDIT GOT IT BACK

    Edited by mat64 (Forum Super Moderator): Please don't post private content.
    Last edited by mat64; 18-12-2007 at 07:08 PM.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Selby
    Posts
    3,357
    Tokens
    2,165

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I like this idea, it would do some good to discourage people from giving out pointless reputation. The reputation system has been causing problems here and there for sometime now, it's nice to see someone offering a possible solution .

    Matt lurvs Jay

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    7,601
    Tokens
    95

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    i disagree, negative rep yes but positive no. There are many ways around it as some people have said. you can just make some random reason like 'thanks for agreeing' or just cover it up with something to do with the thread.

    positive doesnt affect people and if you got it, im sure you dont report it. I dont really see a problem with the current rep system apart from peoples rep dissappearing for no reason, but this seems to have ben cleared up now because of pointless repping...

    if you are going to get rep taken off for pointless repping, you should at least get a PM or have had an announcement about it before it happened..

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hull
    Posts
    230
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JimboJosh View Post
    i disagree, negative rep yes but positive no. There are many ways around it as some people have said. you can just make some random reason like 'thanks for agreeing' or just cover it up with something to do with the thread.

    positive doesnt affect people and if you got it, im sure you dont report it. I dont really see a problem with the current rep system apart from peoples rep dissappearing for no reason, but this seems to have ben cleared up now because of pointless repping...

    if you are going to get rep taken off for pointless repping, you should at least get a PM or have had an announcement about it before it happened..
    Yeah you get a formal PM from a admin saying you have had 50 reputation points removed for issuing pointless reputation.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    477
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    yes.
    but this would turn into a competition of who could get the most red rep.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Moozo View Post
    yes.
    but this would turn into a competition of who could get the most red rep.
    Then just ban them "/

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    7,601
    Tokens
    95

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Demon View Post
    Yeah you get a formal PM from a admin saying you have had 50 reputation points removed for issuing pointless reputation.
    yh but what i was saying was what has happened.. if you read the threads

    they didnt get PM'd and there wasnt an announcement, a bit rubbish really..

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    477
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GommeInc View Post
    Then just ban them "/
    so theyre gonna have to ban users because of a new rule which they introduced? theyre just wasting their time which should be spent on proper moderating.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Moozo View Post
    so theyre gonna have to ban users because of a new rule which they introduced? theyre just wasting their time which should be spent on proper moderating.
    Which is pretty poor lately anyway and it doesn't take alot of effort to ban someone "/ And it's only if the user is starting to become a nuisance. Also, if rep is removed for pointless repping, if the user gets down to 0 rep they shouldn't have anymore removed and if they carry on being stupid, they should be banned. Afterall, part of managing a forum is managing its members...

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •