Need a rule change ... your OPINIONS please.

[Digital]

This forums went wayyyy down hill............ Its like being at school :\ I only ever come on for the computer forums nd stuff

[Lycan]

so in theory i could say i own this forum, and if anyone was to correct me and say i was lying in any form then they would have to be cautioned regarding it... which of course applies to all thoose registered on the forum, so say if Mad corrected me then he would have to caution himself.

[Soil]

so in theory i could say i own this forum, and if anyone was to correct me and say i was lying in any form then they would have to be cautioned regarding it... which of course applies to all thoose registered on the forum, so say if Mad corrected me then he would have to caution himself.

Thats correct.
I am an admin here and I own habboxforum Oh btw MAD is my clone account but I just dont tell people.

[Digital]

I own HabboxForum

[Aflux]

I agree with the new reputation system.

[Lycan]

I agree with the new reputation system.

thats fantastic, whats that got to do with the thread?

[Soil]

thats fantastic, whats that got to do with the thread?

He is actually lying but you cannot say he is as its against the forum rules and MAD will hunt you down.

[Lycan]

He is actually lying but you cannot say he is as its against the forum rules and MAD will hunt you down.

lol, that went straight over my head, makes sense now

[GommeInc]

You can get away with accusing of 'lying or bad things' to a certain extent , if the person you are accusing of lying is like for the example you posted and is obvious it's a joke/lie then I guess you can get away with it, Where as if you say something like they edited their rep then you are trying to make them look bad and if you did say something like that in the street/in real life you'd probably get punched in the face

Anyway how've you been Saurav ?

There is no 'to an extent' with Habbox Forum. You are either accusing of lying or not accusing of lying. There is no inbetween. You get told off for pointing out someone is lying with proof, for example when I said someone who was obviously lying when they mentioned their doctor phoning them up at 10pm to tell them they had cancer. I know for a fact that no place can you that information over the hone. You have to meet the doctor in person, unless that doctor is a rebel and is breaking hundreds of rules. I got that infraction/warning removed in the end, but it shows loads of super moderators/moderators/admins are in auto pilot and are not taking the blindest bit of notice to facts and the obvious...

Also, whoever the liar is needs to be warned not to lie, and given a bigger punishment that the one accusing of lying, because the way the moderators act, anyone who starts an argument needs to be told off, with a warning or infraction, because that;s how moderators and the like run around here...

WHoever writes the rules needs to take about an hour of their time to edit them. Loads of rules are not needed and loads can be combined into one rule or shortened.

[Aflux]

lol, that went straight over my head, makes sense now

You are a very clever boy