Changes to Moderation?

[Slowpoke]

You should receive PMs when you get one, it's called a warning for a reason "/

I'm not actually sure why it was changed but what you're saying makes a lot of sense and I agree.

[Nereo]

I didnt know it started they should have said

[jesus]

You should receive PMs when you get one, it's called a warning for a reason "/

You do now.

[today]

You do now.

Yes we know that, its been said several times..

[jesus]

Yes we know that, its been said several times..

In this thread? I can't see any instance of that.

[The Professor]

It is allready in place you just don't really notice unless you are part of the team who is issueing the bans and giving infractions.

However there is a problem with the warnings, you will still recieve a PM if you are issued with one for now.

^

Sorry jamie, you got owned this time round

Yeah its in place and seems to be working atm, we're getting all the usual aggro so its working like a charm

[today]

In this thread? I can't see any instance of that.

^

Sorry jamie, you got owned this time round

Yeah its in place and seems to be working atm, we're getting all the usual aggro so its working like a charm

Yes jamie, it does appear you are in the wrong, shame that! :rolleyes:

[GommeInc]

^

Sorry jamie, you got owned this time round

Yeah its in place and seems to be working atm, we're getting all the usual aggro so its working like a charm

You're mean to Jesus, you should be fired and banned ASAP

[today]

You're mean to Jesus, you should be fired and banned ASAP

"Negative" Attutide towards fellow Staff?

damn that rule!

[jesus]

Good job I'm big enough to admit I didn't read the whole of yoshis post.

I was replying to Gomme's post also, as he still seemed to think that PMs weren't being received even after yoshi stated otherwise.

I asked Elkaa about the automatic banning system earlier but I'm not allowed if I can say his reply. I don't see why it's so concerning as we already ban or caution people for infraction counts.