Is Leopard that much better than Tiger?

[Hayd93]

The one I'm trying to install it on (the machine I bought purposefully to upgrade) has around 1024mb ram, 733mhz processor & 300GB HD.

I understand that the processor is lower than Leopard requires, but aslong as I have enough ram (1gb) it will run fine on it (afaik).

Powermac i take it ?

and you will need more than 1gb i had a mate running leopard on a 1.4 mac mini. Ran well but every so often lagged slighty that was with 1gb of ram.

[Invent]

Powermac i take it ?

and you will need more than 1gb i had a mate running leopard on a 1.4 mac mini. Ran well but every so often lagged slighty that was with 1gb of ram.

Yeah. I see, but I've read on loads of forums that it'll run fine on 1gb.

[Hayd93]

Yeah. I see, but I've read on loads of forums that it'll run fine on 1gb.

Give it a try then if others have tried this go for it. Tell me the results i will be intrested in this.

[DaveTaylor]

I run it on a G4 eMac Dan, it works trust me

[Hypertext]

I PERSONALLY think it depends. If your going for performance ie something other thana "personal" computer, i'd go tiger, otherwise if your actually going to use it then leopard.

[xxMATTGxx]

I never used tiger, But the way Leopard looks and preforms for me. I think its fantastic, 1GB should be enough. If thats not the case, Im sure it won't be hard to get 2GB? Have fun with it anyway