Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5,108
    Tokens
    3,780

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlueTango View Post
    A judge is a highly trained professional. They'd of had good reasoning for their decisions.

    In a lot of jobs I can think of you'd be sacked if you let your morals get in the way...

    Although they didnt say it in so many words; we need to think about the reasoning as to why they wouldnt do it. The lesbians natural instinct would of lead them to believe that they wouldnt do it because they are lesbians....

    That may be the reason ^ Even if they didnt say it.
    But in a private practice owned by those doctors, it doesn't matter.. they aren't going to be sacked.

    A judge may be a highly trained professional, but the jury also affects the decision made by the judge It looks bad on the judge if the entire jury says guilty.. and he says innocent.. so he follows what they say as a main reason.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    6,722
    Tokens
    3,902
    Habbo
    welldonemate

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Virgin Mary View Post
    Conversely you could argue that forcing the doctors to do something they don't want to is a violation of their human rights and slavery to a degree. It would be understandable if it was doctors in the NHS...but it's not, it's America. Which explains why this happened anyway.
    pretty much clears up this thread.
    (H)

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Oxford
    Posts
    285
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dentafrice View Post
    A judge may be a highly trained professional, but the jury also affects the decision made by the judge It looks bad on the judge if the entire jury says guilty.. and he says innocent.. so he follows what they say as a main reason.
    Over here a judge and a jury wouldnt get chance to contradict eachother as only one of them would make a decision.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5,108
    Tokens
    3,780

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Well I'm guessing this was a civil not criminal case, so there was no jury present.. just realized that.

    So the judge was both the trier of fact and the trier of law. So the judge himself decided whether or not they were guilty/not guilty.. as well as decided the punishment.

    So the judge could have been impartial, we don't know.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    london
    Posts
    1,764
    Tokens
    1,055
    Habbo
    BV

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Doctor's shouldn't have to perform on somebody if they dont believe in what there doing and plus was there just like one doctor in the whole place?
    People sue for no reason nowdayz.


  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Coventry
    Posts
    2,467
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    But the thing is, they were referred to different Doctors willing to perform the treatment. They're not actually losing anything, just the inconvinience of having to do one more consultation. I might have been sympathetic to them if they hadn't been referred, but they're just being selfish.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •