Reputation Idea

[GommeInc]

I'm all for it. The current excuse is that there isn't alot of pointless repping go on. That's fine and dandy because we cannot prove it as much as the people with Admin CP rights. The change would make it fair for everyone, you can rep people you want to and can rep the same person again sooner with no more risks than the current system. At the moment, it is unfair compared to making the limit 20/30. I just hope they realise we've talked and now it's time for them to listen.

This was suggested by the failed council and it was incredibly rude and pointless having it when the idea was not noted and changed among the other changes the council put forward. It should of been changed when we put it forward last time :/

[Hazza]

I often get rep saying "Spreading" or "No reason for rep"
I think its time for change, 50 is way too much.

[today]

I'm not saying you do, it wasn't a dig at you or anyone, my point was, the whole idea of feedback is exactly that, it's a place to suggest ideas, and Management should consider good ideas, even if they are content with a system that they think works perfectly well, as the idea may well be an improvement On the other hand, they may have a good reason why it can't or won't work. Let's wait and see

My bad then Alice.

Either way its only rep, tbh i dont care either way :\

[Firehorse]

I think all the amounts of rep are a bad idea. If instead of a person having to rep 50 people or recieving 10 reps and there was a time limit of say two weeks instead of anything else then pointless reputation wouldn't be encouraged and the people who rarely post or recieve rep themselves wouldn't be negatively affected by it. It's a shame no one thought of this before now.

[Mr.Sam]

I don't think I have ever repped 50 different people.