
why am i arrogant for asking you to use the search feature PLEASE? that is not arrogant on any count.
Well some people dont exactly spend their online time searching through threads which they might and might not have seen before. Just because its been posted again doesnt mean that its pointless. They're only not supported if its pointless, but posting something that some people dont know isnt pointless.
Good game mr.flufflepuss.
uhh, actually, double posting like that is never the right thing. that's why people will always post "already been posted". while "some of us" can't be bothered to look through older threads if we're interested in older news, another group of us doesn't want to look through a bunch of double posts to find something that is actually new. unfortunately for your group, double posting is, again, not supported (so you'd best start reading old news the proper way - by going backwards through forums).Well some people dont exactly spend their online time searching through threads which they might and might not have seen before. Just because its been posted again doesnt mean that its pointless. They're only not supported if its pointless, but posting something that some people dont know isnt pointless.
Good game mr.flufflepuss.
a good game indeed, mr. ignorance.
Don’t ever wrestle with a pig. You’ll both get dirty, but the pig will enjoy it.Well some people dont exactly spend their online time searching through threads which they might and might not have seen before. Just because its been posted again doesnt mean that its pointless. They're only not supported if its pointless, but posting something that some people dont know isnt pointless.
Good game mr.flufflepuss.
(H)
This isnt really news, its just a website someone has found. And plus, when someone does repeat something, you always get atleast someone say "oh i didnt know that, thanks" which makes the thread worthy of actually being a threaduhh, actually, double posting like that is never the right thing. that's why people will always post "already been posted". while "some of us" can't be bothered to look through older threads if we're interested in older news, another group of us doesn't want to look through a bunch of double posts to find something that is actually new. unfortunately for your group, double posting is, again, not supported (so you'd best start reading old news the proper way - by going backwards through forums).
a good game indeed, mr. ignorance.
who says i dont take a bite of the pig? I do like me some bacon.
This isnt really news, its just a website someone has found. And plus, when someone does repeat something, you always get atleast someone say "oh i didnt know that, thanks" which makes the thread worthy of actually being a thread
who says i dont take a bite of the pig? I do like me some bacon.
What I mean is..
Don’t ever wrestle with a pig. You’ll both get dirty, but the pig will enjoy it.
Don't argue with someone whos going to enjoy the arguement, just ignore visa.
(H)
I know, but im saying i will enjoy it, and bite him in the *** by making him realise hes wrong.![]()
but i'm not wrong, children. if double posting was allowed then why are the threads always closed or merged?
*REMOVED*
Edited by Slowpoke (Forum Moderator): Please do not post to cause arguments.
Last edited by Slowpoke; 29-09-2008 at 01:28 PM.
double posting, and threads being closed/merged are for news! THIS IS NOT NEWS. GET IT? IT IS NOT NEWS. Lemme repeat it 3 times so it sticks in your head.
This is not news.
This is not news.
This is not news.
That is why it is allowed to be posted again, its just a find that someone thought would be interesting for some people and it has been. Whilst for others it has been useless, but they shouldnt care, but you do for no apparent reason.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!