Quantum of Solace

[newWORLDorder]

Amazing. Simply amazing. Better than Casino Royale and that was tremendous.

[Josh-H]

Amazing. Simply amazing. Better than Casino Royale and that was tremendous.

How was it?

There were NO gadgets, no stealth a VERY weak story line... the story was poorerly told and you barerly knew what was going on. Then it seem'd to jump a bit and all quickly climax at the end.

[Soy]

Casino Royale was better, didn't really see the meaning of the story

[e5]

I saw it today. I liked it although the ending should have been a bit more exciting

[Josh-H]

I still don't know the relevance of the title to the film?

[Technologic]

Very clever. And it's so obvious that there's to be another sequal...

Show Hide

The fact greene got shot in the head... the Q badges... the fact that minister guy knew he was dealing with villains

[Browney]

I still don't know the relevance of the title to the film?

Show Hide

the company who have people everywhere are called Quantum. Greene says it in the end, before Bond leaves him.

and tbh, I'm with Neversoft. Its no Casino Royale, its a couple of steps behind that, but I would still recommend seeing it. Its only second to Casino Royale out of all the Bond films.

"There were NO gadgets, no stealth a VERY weak story line... the story was poorerly told and you barerly knew what was going on. Then it seem'd to jump a bit and all quickly climax at the end."

When the new Bonds were going to be made, they decided they'd take bond in a new direction. A gritty, a real Bond. No gadget watches that can hold his weight on a peice of thread. The film isn't about stealth! M even says she thinks James has 'inconsolable rage' and he just goes around killing people. This is the point of the film! Bond wants revenge, and so he goes on the warpath. A very weak storyline? Its about revenge, its all been about revenge! I cant see a stronger storyline, a more classic storyline than that!

[Josh-H]

Show Hide

the company who have people everywhere are called Quantum. Greene says it in the end, before Bond leaves him.

and tbh, I'm with Neversoft. Its no Casino Royale, its a couple of steps behind that, but I would still recommend seeing it. Its only second to Casino Royale out of all the Bond films.

"There were NO gadgets, no stealth a VERY weak story line... the story was poorerly told and you barerly knew what was going on. Then it seem'd to jump a bit and all quickly climax at the end."

When the new Bonds were going to be made, they decided they'd take bond in a new direction. A gritty, a real Bond. No gadget watches that can hold his weight on a peice of thread. The film isn't about stealth! M even says she thinks James has 'inconsolable rage' and he just goes around killing people. This is the point of the film! Bond wants revenge, and so he goes on the warpath. A very weak storyline? Its about revenge, its all been about revenge! I cant see a stronger storyline, a more classic storyline than that!

I really liked Casino Royale, it's not like I don't like the new direction. I just didn't like QOS.

[Coldplay]

Amazing. Simply amazing. Better than Casino Royale and that was tremendous.

I hope you were drunk when you wrote that.

How was it?

There were NO gadgets, no stealth a VERY weak story line... the story was poorerly told and you barerly knew what was going on. Then it seem'd to jump a bit and all quickly climax at the end.

Agreed.

All this, added to the fact the end was just like... Is that the end?

The storyline was pointless, it had no real meaning to it, making it EXTREMELY weak. It was erratic and too faced paced the whole way through the film. All this added to the fact there was no sex, no gadgets and hardly any cars =/

[drama]

I still don't know the relevance of the title to the film?

the words Quantum of Solace were found in a scrap book of Flemmings that he used to to write notes for his books, though he never grew on the idea (evidently).