Reputation.

[Nereo]

- 3000 posts
- 400 reputation points
- 365 days (1 year) registered on the forum

I'd like that one but y'know.

Thats certainly more reasonable than how it is now

[--ss--]

People's rep powers are high enough as it is, no need to make them even higher.

[Slowpoke]

People's rep powers are high enough as it is, no need to make them even higher.

Hm, that's only really because we joined this forum before the rep changes. If you look at the rep powers of members who joined in 2008, they're rarely above two or three.

[GommeInc]

3000 would be way too low, you've got a rep power of 7 which is quite high so I don't see why you're complaining and if people have a rep power of 2 or 3 and they joined in 2008, what's the problem with that? They've barely been on the forum for a whole year so it makes sense. You don't want 1 year olds with 5 rep power, they wouldn't of earned it :/

The only issue with the rep system is the amount of people you have to rep before you can rep the same one again.

[FlyingJesus]

Yup. Who's gonna get 600 rep points, plus for a reward of only 1 rep power :| lol

7118 :8

I think posts should be for every 2000 you gain a rep power

I entirely disagree, it's easy for anyone to spam up a load for rep power (think Kyle if you were around during the old rep system) but harder to get rep points up and of course you can't speed up time. The only one I'd argue to lower is how many rep points you need per power, if I were to argue it at all any more.

[nvrspk4]

A bit late on the boat aren't you? The achievment levels, if you will, for post counts, are pretty set in, chances are we won't change them. Its really not that big of an issue people having rep counts of two or three...it gives more meaning to each reputation point really (well, from this point forward, we do have the outstanding problem of old pointless reputation.)