No, he was drink driving, so it should be classed as drink driving.
No, because for it to be murder, he has to have had intention.
There's actually no evidence of this, his Penis was merely poking out, so yes you would assume that but this cannot be proved so we shouldn't really accuse him of it. It could of slipped out when he crashed cause his trousers were low or maybe it was itching or something so he went to look at it, which then distracted him, thus crashing.
No point arguing whether he was having a **** or not, in the end he still killed 2 people because of his driving and he should of got more than 8 years.. just proves the sentences are pathetic in this country.
I recon the good old rule should be re-inforced,
A eye for a eye.
Death penality pls
Actually, its manslaughter. As he did not initially have the incentive to go out and kill somebody.
CAN CAN CAN CAN YOU YOU YOU YOU FEEL FEEL FEEL MA HAHAHAHAHEART IS BEATING
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!