Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    17,006
    Tokens
    26,134
    Habbo
    e5

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hiro View Post
    LOL, what a time to be doing that?!
    And you always get 8 years for drink driving..
    Er why are you laughing? He killed a 16 year old and a 47 year old :/

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    7,556
    Tokens
    58

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Access View Post
    no doubt he owns a corner shop aswell
    Corner shop selling illegal goodies which numb your sensors and slow down your reactions maybe. He was on the North West news around last year I think.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,268
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Access View Post
    should have classed it as dangerous driving instead and gave him 14 years
    No, he was drink driving, so it should be classed as drink driving.

    Quote Originally Posted by Titch View Post
    She be classed a murder and be given life.
    No, because for it to be murder, he has to have had intention.


  4. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    699
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Loser View Post
    No, he was drink driving, so it should be classed as drink driving.
    Still dangerous driving regardless of whether he had been drinking or not.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,268
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Access View Post
    Still dangerous driving regardless of whether he had been drinking or not.
    Yes, but it was dangerous because he had been drinking. Which is the difference between the two.


  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    15,171
    Tokens
    1,267

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Loser View Post
    Yes, but it was dangerous because he had been drinking. Which is the difference between the two.
    Also because he was pleasuring himself


  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    7,752
    Tokens
    756
    Habbo
    katie.pricejorda

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lNaughtynemo View Post
    Also because he was pleasuring himself
    There's actually no evidence of this, his Penis was merely poking out, so yes you would assume that but this cannot be proved so we shouldn't really accuse him of it. It could of slipped out when he crashed cause his trousers were low or maybe it was itching or something so he went to look at it, which then distracted him, thus crashing.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    699
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    No point arguing whether he was having a **** or not, in the end he still killed 2 people because of his driving and he should of got more than 8 years.. just proves the sentences are pathetic in this country.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    973
    Tokens
    1,286

    Default

    I recon the good old rule should be re-inforced,
    A eye for a eye.
    Death penality pls




  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,177
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Actually, its manslaughter. As he did not initially have the incentive to go out and kill somebody.
    CAN CAN CAN CAN YOU YOU YOU YOU FEEL FEEL FEEL MA HAHAHAHAHEART IS BEATING

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •