
It is a WYSIWYG editor because what we see in text edit is what we get. I mean that, yes it is very useful, but something like Coda, where you upload as you save, or with variable find and replace is more useful for coding.I have no issue with having three programs open at once (TextMate, CSSEdit and Cyberduck) to achieve my desired result. Coda drives me crazy when editing CSS; nothing quite matches CSSEdit for design purposes. Coda has a number of features bundled together, but with little sacrifices.
Quicksilver is wonderful!
What do you mean re TextMate though? It is not a WYSIWYG editor... it's a pure (but powerful) text editor.
I'm not crazy, ask my toaster.
That's your opinion though. If you want thousands and tons of little features to do it for you, that's not really a developer, that's a button pusher.I have no issue with having three programs open at once (TextMate, CSSEdit and Cyberduck) to achieve my desired result. Coda drives me crazy when editing CSS; nothing quite matches CSSEdit for design purposes. Coda has a number of features bundled together, but with little sacrifices.
Quicksilver is wonderful!
What do you mean re TextMate though? It is not a WYSIWYG editor... it's a pure (but powerful) text editor.
Of course you can make things easier, but not to where you don't even understand it anymore and can do it on your own.
I'd just be careful when using 'WYSIWYG' to describe TextMate, that's all. I accept what you are saying, but I don't think WYSIWYG is exactly what you are looking for to describe it.
No, I don't like button pushing. I like the real-time update from CSSEdit – useful for web design. (Oh, and groups keep styles and mind very tidy!) Admittedly it depends on focus. Coda is useful for maintaining or developing... TextMate & CSSEdit are more useful for initial development or design. Designing in Coda... well, I find workflow stifled.That's your opinion though. If you want thousands and tons of little features to do it for you, that's not really a developer, that's a button pusher.
Of course you can make things easier, but not to where you don't even understand it anymore and can do it on your own.
There is no denying that Coda is a great program. But so are TextMate and CSSEdit... and Smultron for a free option. Espresso will garner a brief look when that is released (from the makers of CSSEdit). The bottom line, I guess, is whatever works best for the individual. I would suggest the OP makes his own mind up, but ideally using Coda to begin with.
Last edited by Barmi; 07-03-2009 at 07:39 PM.
1) I use MAMP, and it does the job well
2) I would say Coda, pretty much the best.
3) QuickSilver, Adium, VLC, Transmission - To name a few!
Thank you guys one more what svn client program is there out there that is free and good?
Coda has SVN built in![]()
http://ciaranwal.sh/2007/10/10/svn-plug-in-for-textmate
I doubt it's perfect, but it's better than nothing.
I'm not crazy, ask my toaster.
Why'd you reply to me? :shttp://ciaranwal.sh/2007/10/10/svn-plug-in-for-textmate
I doubt it's perfect, but it's better than nothing.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!