Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 33
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Stackingville
    Posts
    2,230
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    First off, Thank you to Garion who took the links out. I was getting wayyy to many people viewing this thread just for the links.

    Next, on button's response..

    I totally agree, 100% that it's just fine for parents to video their children all they want. That's a parents right. I wish my childhood was video'd aswell.

    I really don't think they're going to be harmed by putting the videos on the site. I just think that if they're putting their children on the site for family, they could do it in a more private way. If they have any other reason besides that, I'd like to hear it. It's not everyday someone feels like taping their child in the bathtub, naked, for the world to see.

    If you did watch the link, you'd see how disturbing it was. I would exactly say peadofile, but the father was in the bathroom while his daughter was trying to use it, which caused the daughter to cry and ask/scream at him to leave, and he started talking about a bunch of mindless stuff so she'd be quiet and he could continue filming. It wasn't 'peado', but it was just as disturbing.

    I doubt anyone puts videos of their children naked on youtube for everyone to see and comment on. I'm guessing it's for other family who want to see their child grow up, but can't be there. I just feel that there's a better way of going about that. I'd really be upset if I had nude movies of me in the bathtub on youtube

    Quote Originally Posted by Axel View Post
    the only weird thing is people searching 'first bath' on youtube as if they were lookin for porn?
    Not all peadofiles want older things. I think 8/10 of the top FBI list is people that raped little kids.
    Last edited by Laggings; 25-03-2009 at 03:54 PM.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    7,752
    Tokens
    756
    Habbo
    katie.pricejorda

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by buttons View Post
    it's perfectly normal for parents to want to take pictures/videos of their children no matter what, especially if it's their first child. Big bloody deal, it's a human body, it's a baby, it's not wrong. I'm sure i've seen pictures of friends as naked babies when their mum tries to embarass them

    Do you think they would put their children up on these sites if they wanted them harmed? C'mon there's babies everywhere and if some peado wanted one i'm sure they'd find anywhere, not as though they're gonna track this one down, i doubt the mothers think it's harmful, they're just proud to show their baby off and why shouldn't they?

    if the father was actually perving on his little child (i didn't watch the link) do you really think he would post it over YOUTUBE,where he'd be claimed as a peado like you're trying to say, if he thought it was wrong?

    i see where you're coming from though, i would hate to see mine on the internet!
    I agree, baby nudity really isn't frowned upon and is allowed on TV before the Watershed so there isn't anything wrong with them showing their babies on YouTube. It could be embarrassing for the child but that's slightly different

    Paedofiles? They're not gonna track them down and they're not causing anyone harm by watching videos allowed on YouTube, if I was you I wouldn't use the word as you don't know what it means.

    The girl being walked in on is just cruel and probably illegal therefore shouldn't be allowed.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    4,832
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I searched the flowerz and the shiplist one to see how bad they were... the flowerz isn't too bad but it's not really suitable for YouTube... poor kid... and the shiplist one... unsuitable. I only watched the first 2 seconds and the poor kid was totally nude lol.

    They should keep them as home videos, like my parents did.
    Last edited by Hitman; 25-03-2009 at 03:56 PM.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Stackingville
    Posts
    2,230
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I'm glad basically everyone agrees about that little girl one. That was really bad.

    Uhm, yeah, they won't probably track you down. I wouldn't exactly say 'peado'. People that get 'hot' over little children have a nice heaven in youtube though with this. (I'm not one of them, don't look at me like that!)

    But you got to think, why would parents want nude movies of their children online in a public place at all? It makes you think about their motives..

    Quote Originally Posted by Hitman View Post
    They should keep them as home videos, like my parents did.
    Agreed ^^

    The user with the dad walking in also has a movie called 'Lisa's boobs'. WOW...
    Last edited by Laggings; 25-03-2009 at 04:05 PM.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hackney
    Posts
    14,850
    Tokens
    1,816

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Axel View Post
    the only weird thing is people searching 'first bath' on youtube as if they were lookin for porn?

    They prob do ;l


  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    13,168
    Tokens
    21,950
    Habbo
    JennyJukes

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    god damn i keep pressing add instead of watching it i hope i don't get any related videos :X
    nah they're not that bad, look at the rest of the videos, looks like they're really proud of their little girl. Loads of perfectly acceptable videos there. On the one when she's on the toilet there's a reply there explaining what it was about when asked

    do I do what often? the door wasn't really shut, daddy was telling her that if she didn't hurry up and got potty that he would shut the door. she was then 'telling on daddy' to me saying, "daddy shut the door" meaning he was going to. make sense?
    i think what she's saying is that she doesn't want her dad to shut the door and she's crying to her mum saying "daddy shut the door " that could be a cover up but honestly they were just winding her up and if i saw that happen i wouldn't think anything bad of it.

    i agree with the privacy though but if people want to share their family life i don't mind.

    oh and yeh i saw that one, "coping a feel" they just look like a family having fun, why not!


    pigged 25/08/2019



  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,138
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    What the **** man?

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Stackingville
    Posts
    2,230
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by buttons View Post
    god damn i keep pressing add instead of watching it i hope i don't get any related videos :X
    nah they're not that bad, look at the rest of the videos, looks like they're really proud of their little girl. Loads of perfectly acceptable videos there. On the one when she's on the toilet there's a reply there explaining what it was about when asked

    i think what she's saying is that she doesn't want her dad to shut the door and she's crying to her mum saying "daddy shut the door " that could be a cover up but honestly they were just winding her up and if i saw that happen i wouldn't think anything bad of it.

    i agree with the privacy though but if people want to share their family life i don't mind.

    oh and yeh i saw that one, "coping a feel" they just look like a family having fun, why not!
    They also egg her on in 2+ other videos, 'Flowers Best Fit' and another one, which makes me think that what he said was just a cover up. And Yes, I agree. Loads of amazing 'acceptable' videos have been posted by all 3 of the users I pointed out. But what I'm concerned with, are the ones that arn't acceptable, or shouldn't be. I don't it's it's right to post a full body nude shot of your 6 month girl in the tub, taking a crap, or wiping her off. Atleast not on a public website where any lowlife, scumbag, sick person that gets hot on little kids, can just search for a couple of terms and find loads of this stuff. If they wan't to post those videos, post them on a private website, where only the people they want to view them can. But yeah, the coping a feel was ok, yeah

    EDIT: 'Throwing of Children' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6JWP...eature=related
    If they missed, that would be bad.
    Last edited by Laggings; 25-03-2009 at 04:22 PM.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    17,016
    Tokens
    34,727

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I don't think it should be allowed, no - but I don't think parents are doing it just so they can let disgusting people watch them for sick reasons - for all we know it could be a mother with a new born baby uploading a video for their dad to see who works abroad or something - I don't think that they fully understand the severity of it maybe? I mean, my parents have tons of videos with me naked and photos - but they're sensible enough not to post it on the internet... Maybe it's that some parents jsut don't see... that side to things.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Stackingville
    Posts
    2,230
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Exactly what I've been saying Kardan. They post it for family who can't see, but they don't post it in a private website, like facebook. I think it could be handled differently.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •