WHY WAS MY THREAD DELETED.

[GordonBanks]

You're not even allowed to post a link to it with a warning :rolleyes:
******* joke

[Catzsy]

Doesn't matter who posted it, it would still be removed. Doesn't matter if it doesn't offend anyone, it still avoids the filter and images that do so aren't allowed to be posted directly on the forum. I'm sure a link to it with a warning would have been okay though .. ?

I do not think this would have been suitable with a warning.

it doesn't avoid the filter? when **** refers to cockerel?
no i cba tell people to click a link just to view a couple of funny pictures. and correct, no-one in their right mind would have found it offensive or disturbing.

It is too sexually graphic by insinuation in content for this forum - that is my opinion. Nobody replying to that advertisment thought it was about a cockeral. Please request a review from Matt Garner or pm nvrspk4 or Jin. I cannot be fairer than that. Thanks.

Should have just been moved to spam really.

Not suitable for spam section either in my opinion.

[xxMATTGxx]

I don't actually mind complaints regarding what Moderators do etc. What really bugs is me is the rudeness what comes with it, there is no need to be rude about it.

[GordonBanks]

It is too sexually graphic by insinuation in content for this forum - that is my opinion. Nobody replying to that advertisment thought it was about a cockeral.

Yes they did, they thought it was some guy, who wanted to put his cockerel into his wife's box. but it would not fit. You're thinking into things too much all the people who replied owned their own cockerels. prove me wrong.

[Catzsy]

Yes they did, they thought it was some guy, who wanted to put his cockerel into his wife's box. but it would not fit. You're thinking into things too much all the people who replied owned their own cockerels. prove me wrong.

I dont have to or need to spend my time arguing with you. As I said your next step is to get a review. You may be agreed with. who knows :S This is my opinion only. Thanks.

[GordonBanks]

no, you're just being stubborn. i dont give a toss about a review. You know I'm right but ye do one.

Edited by MattGarner (Forum Manager): Please do not be rude towards a forum member.

[xxMATTGxx]

no, you're just being stubborn. i dont give a toss about a review. You know I'm right but ye do one.

Edited by MattGarner (Forum Manager): Please do not be rude towards a forum member.

Look, will you stop being rude towards members. The content you posted and some of the comments left on that ebay item was sexually graphic. Some of it is not accepted to be posted on the forum. It's quite obvious by the comments made on that it wasn't for the real "animal". :rolleyes:

[GordonBanks]

which i did in this thread, it got removed :S
no it was not a real animal in the first picture, it was a toy cockerel. What else was it for? How is people selling a cardboard box that people want to put their cockerels in to keep safe dirty or sexually graphic?

[xxMATTGxx]

which i did in this thread, it got removed :S
no it was not a real animal in the first picture, it was a toy cockerel. What else was it for? How is people selling a cardboard box that people want to put their cockerels in to keep safe dirty or sexually graphic?

If you look at the questions other ebayers asked the seller, then you will know why.

[GordonBanks]

They are all suitable questions to ask, such as would their cockerel fit in?