Staff behaviour

[Grig]

Yes this is a very very positive and needed thread. I have had to send in some complaints about staff members' bahaviour, and really it is just all ignored- hell I don't even get a reply. You are right in saying they should set an example and not run around immaturly making fools out of themselves and annoying other people (whether it be normal members or other members of staff).

I really wish to see things dealt with, or at least a simple reply when I complain. Now I complained two weeks before Sammeth. was appointed to his current position in charge of staff issues, however I understand people are busy, but some staff issues need to be dealt with- or at least I should get a reply.

The conduct of some (now remember this is a small percentage) staff members in various departments has fallen two fold. The majority are nice, mature people so don't get me wrong I am talking about everyone. But when I wanted staff issues dealt with, it was passed like thin air.

Very good issue, Imensemen- have some rep!

[xxMATTGxx]

Well I am not aware of that rule, although te rule to have upper management approve of the person being hired, unless in extreme cases, is ridiculous imo

And to what you were saying Jake, I was fired on the spot months ago from events for saying **** on one of my events (within reasons imo )

I am not saying that firing was right or wrong, but I know they used to fire on the spot - isn't there some 'warning' rule now?

I'm confused by your post. From what I remember nvr told me that he could stop me from firing someone. But I can understand that because I could just fire a for a stupid and not real reason. Hiring, yes that's different as I need to ask before hiring anyone into the Moderation Department.

[Accipiter]

i saw this happen with x.samlouise when she spammed like mad and i didn't see any disipline and it took a while if any was actually conducted, i know she was contacted because she sent me a hate message... which staff really shouldn't do. shouldn't say staff, should just say her.

[buttons]

totally agree, there are a few staff who are as bad as some members, it's not a personal grudge i hold but for example one member of staff being "sexually explicit" as it were, it wasn't even a rvr or anything it was high up :eusa_danc. anyway yeah i guess you don't see much being done about it because apparently s/mods can't edit staffs posts and they're just meant to be sent to AGMs?? i think that should be changed...

apparently my post reports were going to be passed onto jin or nvr about one member of staff who was just taking the absolute piss and never heard anything about it, said member of staff is still not fired (not that i've seen them do anything wrong recently) so i don't think some things are being taken seriously. i'm not just gonna make assumptions but it's as though they can't let go of old staff and making excuses to keep them when they should be long gone but what do i know

[Immenseman]

I think that maybe just one moderator should be allowed to deal with staff posts. In an almost super/staff moderator. I'd recommend one of the Super Moderators. I don't think normal moderators or even super moderators should be allowed to deal with staff posts.

Just one active user who is allowed to deal with all staff other than managers would resolve the issue quite nicely. Not firing them but given permissions to hand them infraction/warnings. They could look at all the staff post reports and let the staff editor deal with staff complaints and staff permissions.

[Accipiter]

I think that maybe just one moderator should be allowed to deal with staff posts. In an almost super/staff moderator. I'd recommend one of the Super Moderators. I don't think normal moderators or even super moderators should be allowed to deal with staff posts.

Just one active user who is allowed to deal with all staff other than managers would resolve the issue quite nicely. Not firing them but given permissions to hand them infraction/warnings. They could look at all the staff post reports and let the staff editor deal with staff complaints and staff permissions.

i heard bomb-head deals with staff rule breaks. But it has to be passed onto him by another mod.

[Immenseman]

Bomb-Head has stepped down. That is how Habbox deal with staff breaks. A moderator passes it on to the staff editor which is now Sammeth. who has replaced Bomb-Head. I just think having one well respected super moderator and allow them to deal with staff as well it'll quash such issues.

They can be chosen by Sammeth. and they can work together in ensuring that staff actually behave like they should because it clearly isn't just me who has noticed it. It's you, Liam, Jen and Grig which are like half of the people who have posted.

[Accipiter]

wasn't sammeth head of graphics before? thats a huge promo if so.

it caused quite a bit of trouble when i wasn't seeing anything getting done about x.samlouise so im all for a team of even 2-3 who treat with the staff reports.

[Sammeth.]

Does literally no one know who I am?!!?!?

At least give me a week to see if things improve, if they're still shoddy, lets see what we can do :8! Not being funny, but I think since I've started I've seen one post report that related to a staff member, and I haven't had one PM from a member about staff behaviour. The more posts that get reported and the more stuff people send me then it gets dealt with a lot more. I do browse the forums a lot, but its impossible for me to track everything

[Immenseman]

Probably because people have stopped because nothing is ever done Nah, I know what you mean, I don't think it's a huge issue. Just when situations do arise, like some of the ones mentioned in the thread they aren't dealt with.