Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Wolverhampton
    Posts
    4,825
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:- View Post
    TheWolf for Prime Minister!

    The only thing I would disagree on would be Education and the National Health Service, I think they are overfunded in some ways, although if we didn't waste billions on the European Union, foreign aid and so on then we'd have enough money for the NHS, Education, military and probably still be left with a surplus at the end!.
    That is true, I disagree on the foreign aid, as giving is good, but spending £40million of our TAX on the EU and 1/6th of our annual TAX on benefits is ******* disgusting, if I were PM, benefits would be cut dramatically, roll on March!

    Stefan for PM.
    PSN: StefanWolves
    Add me if you play COD Black Ops or Fifa 11.

  2. #12
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is online now Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,044
    Tokens
    995
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheWolf View Post
    That is true, I disagree on the foreign aid, as giving is good, but spending £40million of our TAX on the EU and 1/6th of our annual TAX on benefits is ******* disgusting, if I were PM, benefits would be cut dramatically, roll on March!

    Stefan for PM.
    I agree, giving is good.. however, say you give 1/3 of your wages to charity, well if your family is starving you dont leave them to starve and give 1/3 to charity no matter what do you?. It is the same with the country, the country can only give what it can afford, which is nothing at the moment.

    The Conservatives have to be radical or they will be a failure, and some of the messages i'm getting from the Conservatives such as attempting to join with the Liberal Democrats are not good signs at all, not the signs of a radical government anyway.

    United Kingdom comes first, and always should do.


  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Wolverhampton
    Posts
    4,825
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:- View Post
    I agree, giving is good.. however, say you give 1/3 of your wages to charity, well if your family is starving you dont leave them to starve and give 1/3 to charity no matter what do you?. It is the same with the country, the country can only give what it can afford, which is nothing at the moment.

    The Conservatives have to be radical or they will be a failure, and some of the messages i'm getting from the Conservatives such as attempting to join with the Liberal Democrats are not good signs at all, not the signs of a radical government anyway.

    United Kingdom comes first, and always should do.
    That's true, giving is good but only what we can afford, I don't think Labour would be as bad If they had a decent leader, and we all thought Tony Blair was bad... look at this idiot we've got, oh how we miss you Blair! - never ever thought I'd say that.
    PSN: StefanWolves
    Add me if you play COD Black Ops or Fifa 11.

  4. #14
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is online now Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,044
    Tokens
    995
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    The only difference between Tony Blair and Gordon Brown was that Blair had the slick factor which ment he could get away with a lot of things and worm his way out of questions and issues, but don't worry he'll be back fairly soon as President of the EUSSR, funded by our taxes to fund his million pound property empire while lording it over the whole of Europe (totally unelected I might add) telling us what light bulbs we can and cannot use!.


  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Wolverhampton
    Posts
    4,825
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:- View Post
    The only difference between Tony Blair and Gordon Brown was that Blair had the slick factor which ment he could get away with a lot of things and worm his way out of questions and issues, but don't worry he'll be back fairly soon as President of the EUSSR, funded by our taxes to fund his million pound property empire while lording it over the whole of Europe (totally unelected I might add) telling us what light bulbs we can and cannot use!.
    lol the light bulb ban made me laugh, power savin bulbs are ****, and you can't use them on light dimmers >.<

    least the leader of europe will be english though, and not some french ******* telling everyone what to do.
    PSN: StefanWolves
    Add me if you play COD Black Ops or Fifa 11.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    12,405
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    -rep to Bono if he ever registers on HxF :@.

    Hasn't Barack Obama declined to meet with Brown? Not surprising :rolleyes:.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    7,752
    Tokens
    756
    Habbo
    katie.pricejorda

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Although I agree with what's being said about Labour, in terms of Defence, the Tories seem to be far worse.

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6836192.ece

    They suggested scrapping one submarine, they're also suggesting scrapping the two aircraft carriers, the Airbus A400M (military transporter) and the Eurofighter Typhoons. All in all, they play an enormous part in our armed forces.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,590
    Tokens
    33,601
    Habbo
    xxMATTGxx

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jordy View Post
    Although I agree with what's being said about Labour, in terms of Defence, the Tories seem to be far worse.

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6836192.ece

    They suggested scrapping one submarine, they're also suggesting scrapping the two aircraft carriers, the Airbus A400M (military transporter) and the Eurofighter Typhoons. All in all, they play an enormous part in our armed forces.
    You already know my view on that. People don't understand that we need the new equipment to keep our Navy, Air Force and Army to top standard in case of any threats. We need the two need aircraft carriers due to the old ones we are currently using are over 40 years old! Typhoon to replace any ageing fighter jets aka Tornado. F-35 to replace the very old Harrier. A400 to replace the old C-130s. It all makes sense but they still want to cut it <_<. Stupid people to be honest.

    Edit: The Type 45 destroyer's look pretty amazing tbh.
    Last edited by xxMATTGxx; 24-09-2009 at 07:13 AM.


    Previous Habbox Roles
    Co-Owner of Habbox | General Manager | Assistant General Manager (Staff) | Forum Manager | Super Moderator | Forum Moderator

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Wolverhampton
    Posts
    4,825
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MattGarner View Post
    You already know my view on that. People don't understand that we need the new equipment to keep our Navy, Air Force and Army to top standard in case of any threats. We need the two need aircraft carriers due to the old ones we are currently using are over 40 years old! Typhoon to replace any ageing fighter jets aka Tornado. F-35 to replace the very old Harrier. A400 to replace the old C-130s. It all makes sense but they still want to cut it <_<. Stupid people to be honest.

    Edit: The Type 45 destroyer's look pretty amazing tbh.
    The F-35 and Typhoon/Euro fighter or amazing, we should still keep some harriers though imo.

    And yeah, the type 45 destroyers are amazing, the fastest ship (in terms of power to weight ratio) in the world, I think, read it somewhere! and it's also meant to be ultra quiet.
    PSN: StefanWolves
    Add me if you play COD Black Ops or Fifa 11.

  10. #20
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is online now Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,044
    Tokens
    995
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jordy View Post
    Although I agree with what's being said about Labour, in terms of Defence, the Tories seem to be far worse.

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6836192.ece

    They suggested scrapping one submarine, they're also suggesting scrapping the two aircraft carriers, the Airbus A400M (military transporter) and the Eurofighter Typhoons. All in all, they play an enormous part in our armed forces.
    Another reason to avoid the Conservatives and vote for UKIP.


Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •