Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 41
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    7,177
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Technologic View Post
    52% of men have HIV?

    Pardon... Dont you mean 52% of men with HIV are heterosexual and 43% homosexual?
    Yeah you get what I mean.
    Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    959
    Tokens
    182

    Default

    personally i think its unfair, anyone can have AIDs!
    we'll do what we've always done
    shut our eyes and hope for the best.

  3. #13
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,000
    Tokens
    706
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    If it is that case as Technologic stated, that more hetrosexual men as a percentage have HIV/Aids than homosexual men, then I think it should be uplifted then as it would make little difference.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    7,601
    Tokens
    95

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    i thought it was providing you had no sexual contact for 6 months?

    I think its still fair. Homosexuals contract it far easier than people who are hetero. I know what youre saying about the statistics, but thats new cases. Not current.

    In any case, you sue statistics for 2007, but the NHS page im on also uses stats and its the 63% youre on about. So you cant use stats that were used in 2007, and then disregard others made in that time.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    To be fair, you could just lie, but why should they? As mentioned in the statistics, and common sense, you'd learn that not all homosexuals are aids/HIV ridden. What should be done is tests on EVERYONE giving blood, to make sure the blood is safe. Infact, the blood is tested anyway post-test in machines which shake the blood around and keep it oxygenated. So arguably, anyone should be allowed to donate if they so choose, and if the machine fails the blood and the blood fails the tests, it shouldn't be used.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,817
    Tokens
    63,679
    Habbo
    FlyingJesus

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    What happened to the other 5% of men with HIV? Are they entirely asexual?
    | TWITTER |



    Blessed be
    + * + * + * +

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Middlesbrough, England
    Posts
    9,336
    Tokens
    10,837

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FlyingJesus View Post
    What happened to the other 5% of men with HIV? Are they entirely asexual?
    Hermaphrodite?

    As far as I'm aware and I'm not entirely an expert on blood donation but aren't donors decreasing (or is that just organ donors?) so surely to disallow the homosexuals just cos they might have HIV sounds ridiculous to me.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    2,686
    Tokens
    490

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FlyingJesus View Post
    What happened to the other 5% of men with HIV? Are they entirely asexual?
    They could have recieved it through other methods, e.g. sharing needles etc.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    7,601
    Tokens
    95

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Inseriousity. View Post
    Hermaphrodite?

    As far as I'm aware and I'm not entirely an expert on blood donation but aren't donors decreasing (or is that just organ donors?) so surely to disallow the homosexuals just cos they might have HIV sounds ridiculous to me.
    Actually I do believe it's increasing.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,355
    Tokens
    334
    Habbo
    CocoCue

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    To put simple, would you like blood from someone who's giving other males blow-jobs or even having **** sex? No!

    So I think its fair.

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •