Who from HxF would you back in a campaign for Government?

[Alkaz]

Personal opinion I guess.

[-:Undertaker:-]

Ye probably Dan, I share most his recent views on the EU and immigration etc.

Thanks!!!

Your bezzie, -:Undertaker:-

4lyf.

Possibly Dan but some of his views seem too far-right for my liking. I'd say GommeInc, his views seem rather Consverative and realistic, and are also Euro-sceptic

I'd say my views on things such as criminal justice are far-right, but as i've said before;- if I gained the keys to number 10 i'd hold a referendum on all key issues such as the dealth penalty (basically anything which is not directly linked to national security or the economy). I'd say my methods are liberal-right but my views are more to the right.

Dan has the worst political views ever, truth.

If you believe that the individual is lower than the state, that the state has to be big and government has to be big, that scum is put on equal par when it commits crime with the victim and that the people are there to be milked and know little better than yourself/the elite - then I do have the worst political views ever.

If not, then we are on the same wave-length.

[Immenseman]

Yeah but why would you on things like death penalty? There is a decent chance that people, who don't acknowledge the issue and consequences of mistaken identity etc will vote to bring the death penalty back. I want a strong leader who won't hold referendums to people please but will actually act on their intuition. Stability is arguably the key to a strong and therefore successful government, holding referendums on things left right and centre doesn't create stability. People will begin to question and it would just cause uproar.

[Seatherny]

Yeah but why would you on things like death penalty? There is a decent chance that people, who don't acknowledge the issue and consequences of mistaken identity etc will vote to bring the death penalty back. I want a strong leader who won't hold referendums to people please but will actually act on their intuition. Stability is arguably the key to a strong and therefore successful government, holding referendums on things left right and centre doesn't create stability. People will begin to question and it would just cause uproar.

Fully agreed. Referendums on everything would be idiotic.

[FlyingJesus]

Full list time, go go go!


**Garion for PM because he's easy to control and he says stupid things so everything that goes wrong would be his fault.

**Myself as Chancellor of the Exchequer for the same reasons really - I'd be the one really controlling things and wouldn't get nearly as much blame. Also when Garion eventually makes one mistake too many I could pull a Gordon Brown and take over properly for a bit.

**Secretary of State for Justice (and First Secretary of State) would be Sam because he does legal nonsense or something and is fairly adept at lying his way out of trouble.

**Bethie for Leader of the House of Commons because she'd be loud and make people do stuff by scaring them.

**Ryan (GommeStink) for SoS for Communities and Local Government because he's fairly intelligent for an Essex boy and apart from being friends with the wrong people generally does what he's told

**Smiddy as SoS for Defence because he's big and ginger and took over most of the world last year which is pretty good going.

**Dandertaker as SoS for Energy and Climate Change because he'd let us start using nuclear power which could be fun, and also it keeps him away from too much foreign policy while still letting him be a bit racist when he needs to be.

**Rosie for SoS for Health mostly for the irony.

**Chirs (Neversoft) as SoS for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs because he thinks he's foreign anyway.

**Marc as SoS for Transport because he likes boats and trains... a bit too much but oh well.

**Harry and Blake to share the positions of SoS for International Development and SoS for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs because they're foreign and obviously nothing exists in Australia so rural is all they know.

**Ashton (Metric) as SoS for Business, Innovation and Skills because because he likes money. He can take Work and Pensions for a bit too but we'll dissolve that because it'll be a laugh.

**SoS for Culture, Media and Sport can be Dandy Rave (-Wolverine) because I think those things are literally the only things that happen in Canada.

**SoS for Children, Schools and Families... err... Jen I suppose because she is a child, went to school every so often and is starting to raise her own family now.

The other positions aren't important because they're just about the Welsh and that rubbish.

[le harry]

hey thats mean but i agree

[Bun]

defossssssssssss not undertaker. erm probs immenseman or alexxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, reppin labour.

[-:Undertaker:-]

Yeah but why would you on things like death penalty? There is a decent chance that people, who don't acknowledge the issue and consequences of mistaken identity etc will vote to bring the death penalty back. I want a strong leader who won't hold referendums to people please but will actually act on their intuition. Stability is arguably the key to a strong and therefore successful government, holding referendums on things left right and centre doesn't create stability. People will begin to question and it would just cause uproar.

I'm afraid again this is a case of somebody treating the people like they are stupid. People know it can go wrong and has gone wrong, but as I have said before, it would only be used in the strongest cases. On the referendums issue, yes it does have stability. It means a policy is voted on via public opinion and not that of the ruling elite and leaves no doubt in peoples minds on the issue of government, what is voted for goes - simple as that. It cannot get more simple.

A core example if when Labour went back on its 2005 Manifesto pledge to hold a referendum and it shows even more with the little choice people have with the main three parties, I mean seriously, there is little difference between them at all now.

Fully agreed. Referendums on everything would be idiotic.

Oh because it would mean popular ideas such as death penalty and withdrawal from the European Union possibly taking place? - the left (as shown by this thread) could never stand the possibility of general opinion turning into policy.

[kk.]

Dan has the worst political views ever, truth.

truth.

and erm, im not too sure tbh, do you mean their views or who i think would get far because of their views?

[Immenseman]

I'm afraid again this is a case of somebody treating the people like they are stupid. People know it can go wrong and has gone wrong, but as I have said before, it would only be used in the strongest cases. On the referendums issue, yes it does have stability. It means a policy is voted on via public opinion and not that of the ruling elite and leaves no doubt in peoples minds on the issue of government, what is voted for goes - simple as that. It cannot get more simple.

Oh because it would mean popular ideas such as death penalty and withdrawal from the European Union possibly taking place? - the left (as shown by this thread) could never stand the possibility of general opinion turning into policy.

A core example if when Labour went back on its 2005 Manifesto pledge to hold a referendum and it shows even more with the little choice people have with the main three parties, I mean seriously, there is little difference between them at all now.

You're just totally contradicting yourself. How on Earth can you say that referendums leads to stability? That's obscene and alien. It's obvious that making rash decisions and giving complete power to the people just wouldn't work. It's like imagine the users of Habbox were allowed to decide in a vote who would be General Manager, it wouldn't be the right person for the job, it would be a popular individual. Or if there was a poll on here "Should HabboxLive stay open?" I reckon that would be a very close vote, as would capital punishment. HxL closing because of a majority wanting it to isn't beneficial for Habbox, like capital punishment isn't beneficial for this country. Referendums on such things won't improve a thing. Simple.

You'd be bottom of my list to vote from this forum, just below GommeInc and Robald :8