Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 31
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    18,233
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Biohazard View Post
    I think for something like this, death isn't enough. Torture, followed by death is better suited.
    i agree im a fan of the idea of torturing terrorists


  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    5,289
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Biohazard View Post
    I think for something like this, death isn't enough. Torture, followed by death is better suited.
    I'm sure theres some kind of law....


    hell with it, go for it!!

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    3,216
    Tokens
    475

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Much deserved.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    7,752
    Tokens
    756
    Habbo
    katie.pricejorda

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pix View Post
    I think that executing them years and years after their crime was committed is stupid, because they've had time to change and become a whole different person. They've had time to mature and reflect on what they've done, make changes in the community, etc. It makes more sense in my opinion to execute them right away
    American justice is strange to me.
    Yes I mean it's not like he continued to support the radical Iraqi government becoming Defence Minister in 2003 and then going into hiding once the invasion began.

    However lets not forget the work he's done for the local football team, he's made some good changes in the community. A boy fell over in his village and this gentlemen phoned for an ambulance and waited with the boy. I would say he's a valued member of the community :rolleyes:

    What are you on mate? Iraqi courts, Iraqi laws, Iraqi gallows, not American.

    As for reflecting on the matter, this is what he had to say in court about it, "I am the one who gave orders to the army to demolish villages and relocate the villagers. The army was responsible to carry out those orders. I am not defending myself. I am not apologising. I did not make a mistake.". Doesn't exactly seem like he's "matured" into a "totally different person".

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    12,405
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Hear, hear.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    8,355
    Tokens
    130

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Biohazard View Post
    I think for something like this, death isn't enough. Torture, followed by death is better suited.
    Your right on that one, I saw what he did on the news and it was ..... up
    :shifty:

  7. #17
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,161
    Tokens
    122
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Lets hope for Mr Blair, Mr Bush and the rest of them to be next.


    And if you wanna buy me flowers
    Just go ahead now
    And if you like to talk for hours
    Just go ahead now


  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Plymouth
    Posts
    9,406
    Tokens
    1,777

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I don't agree with this at all for a few reasons.

    First, he got into this because he gassed and killed 5,000 people, why the "most were women and children" came into this I don't know but anyway, he was then allowed to live for 20 years knowing his mission was a success then the best way they could solve it was to hang him which could more than likely of killed him instantly? Why didn't they slowly gas him with something that takes time so he could suffer a bit?

    Second, I disagree with capital punishment, an eye for an eye doesn't give the former his eye back.

    Backing up my second reason, presidents kill millions with these pointless wars, why are only terrorists killed for it? I'm sure Bush ordering an attack on Bagdad felt a bit like terrorism to the innocent people that lived there.
    Last edited by Neil; 26-01-2010 at 06:03 PM.

  9. #19
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,161
    Tokens
    122
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    What most people dont know (or dont wish to hear) is that the Ba'ath regime had little option but to ruthlessly crush opposition from the Kurds, of course the means used were totally barbaric but theres a lot to this that does not meet the eye. The attack was not a totally random attack, it was used to put down opposition against the government which could have seen it overthrown. In Iraq the hatred between the Kurds and the Iraqis could be compared to that of what some of us might feel towards the Nazis and what they did - and we used gas against the Germans in WW1 and our allie the United States used an atomic bomb against the Japanese Empire in WW2.

    It all depends on where you are from and your take on history to form an opinion on something like this.
    Last edited by -:Undertaker:-; 26-01-2010 at 07:47 PM.


    And if you wanna buy me flowers
    Just go ahead now
    And if you like to talk for hours
    Just go ahead now


  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,337
    Tokens
    150

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jordy View Post
    Yes I mean it's not like he continued to support the radical Iraqi government becoming Defence Minister in 2003 and then going into hiding once the invasion began.

    However lets not forget the work he's done for the local football team, he's made some good changes in the community. A boy fell over in his village and this gentlemen phoned for an ambulance and waited with the boy. I would say he's a valued member of the community :rolleyes:

    What are you on mate? Iraqi courts, Iraqi laws, Iraqi gallows, not American.

    As for reflecting on the matter, this is what he had to say in court about it, "I am the one who gave orders to the army to demolish villages and relocate the villagers. The army was responsible to carry out those orders. I am not defending myself. I am not apologising. I did not make a mistake.". Doesn't exactly seem like he's "matured" into a "totally different person".
    I was trying to state that if they waited this long to finally execute him they could of tried changing him in person maybe, just a thought. Altough i doubt it will work... i just don't understand the whole concept of waiting this long and just hanging him.
    SKADOOOOOOOOOOOSH

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •