Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


View Poll Results: What course of action do you support in regards to the Falklands?

Voters
24. You may not vote on this poll
  • Retaliate & recover the Falklands if Argentine forces take any military action.

    19 79.17%
  • The UK should take military action first to counter any first move by Argentina.

    4 16.67%
  • We should abandon our claims to the colony of the Falklands and its seabed straight away.

    1 4.17%
  • We should not retaliate back if Argentina occupies the islands again and should abandon our claim.

    0 0%
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 44
  1. #11
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,000
    Tokens
    706
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    The Obama administration is an absolute disgrace, while I disagreed anyway with Britain fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan alongside the United States; they refuse to even support the UK in its diplomatic defence of the islands of which we had since before Argentina was even a nation state. They say go home (the South Americans) so perhaps they would all like to return to where they all came from which was Spain and Portugal? - ahh, only works one way as usual.

    Quote Originally Posted by Catzsy View Post
    The Poll is extremely narrow and doesn't mention negoiation at all either directly or via the UN. It's not a black and white issue as the poll seems to suggest.
    To add to this anyway, theres one vital point you continue to dodge everytime which is that the people of the Falklands do not want to negociate, they are British and the islands are British - there is nothing to talk about, nothing to discuss and nothing to compromise over. If France wanted to discuss whether or not London was a part of the UK, would you support entering talks with France over that?

    The Falklands colony is no different to London, Liverpool, Bristol, Manchester, Devon or anywhere else in the United Kingdom and its colonies.
    Last edited by -:Undertaker:-; 25-02-2010 at 08:24 PM.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    3,111
    Tokens
    1,411

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    What actually is Argentina's motive for this relaunched operation on the islands? Are they trying to wreck relations? Gain even more land and power?

    or are they even in it for the oil?
    Jordan


  3. #13
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,000
    Tokens
    706
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Klux View Post
    What actually is Argentina's motive for this relaunched operation on the islands? Are they trying to wreck relations? Gain even more land and power?

    or are they even in it for the oil?
    They want the land, oil and often use the issue as an excuse to drum up support to save their government. Back in the 1980s when they last invaded, the invasion was only launched because the regime that Argentina had in power was on its last legs and needed to try and drum up some support for the government - our invasion helped futher weaken the regime and eventually it collapsed.

    At the moment the Argentine government is facing economic problems and an election is around a year off I think so they are very keen to make it seem as though its the 'government vs the imperialists'. Our quick response last time helped take them by suprise as they had expected the British to be too weak to attack back, but we did and we won them.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    3,111
    Tokens
    1,411

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Thanks for clearing that up.

    If I'm honest I can't see the locals who occupy the islands to keen on Argentina ruling the island. A large majority of the population are either Falkland Islander British or simply British.

    Why would they want a foreign country with a foreign language taking over there island? In addition, we aren't really to in control of the island. The British Government has handed many of the responsibilities to the Falkland Government excluding the management of defense and foreign affairs understandably.

    In my eyes, they are basically invading the island for their own gains. Which is pretty out of order. I am sure their lives under British control would be much more happier and straight forward compared to being under Argentinian control.
    Last edited by Suspective; 25-02-2010 at 08:42 PM.
    Jordan


  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,590
    Tokens
    33,601
    Habbo
    xxMATTGxx

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Klux View Post
    Thanks for clearing that up.

    If I'm honest I can't see the locals who occupy the islands to keen on Argentina ruling the island. A large majority of the population are either Falkland Islander British or simply British.

    Why would they want a foreign country with a foreign language taking over there island? In addition, we aren't really to in control of the island. The British Government has handed many of the responsibilities to the Falkland Government excluding the management of defense and foreign affairs understandably.

    In my eyes, they are basically invading the island for their own gains. Which is pretty out of order. I am sure their lives under British control would be much more happier and straight forward compared to being under Argentinian control.
    You are right about the people living there, they just want to be British and live their lives. They do not want another country invading them and taking over their land.


    Previous Habbox Roles
    Co-Owner of Habbox | General Manager | Assistant General Manager (Staff) | Forum Manager | Super Moderator | Forum Moderator

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    12,315
    Tokens
    33,716
    Habbo
    dbgtz

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I'm honestly suprised were not in world war III. I think it's more publicity tbh, when do you see Argentina in the news? They're unimportant and the US are being ridiculous, they won't defend land of their "special relationship" country but they'll invade, I mean "defend" a completely irrelevant country.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,590
    Tokens
    33,601
    Habbo
    xxMATTGxx

    Latest Awards:

    Default Argentina is to seek the backing of the United States in its dispute with Britain ove

    Argentina is to seek the backing of the United States in its dispute with Britain over Falklands oil exploration as President Kirchner prepares to meet Hillary Clinton next week.

    Fresh from an inconclusive meeting at the UN, where Argentina failed to secure anything other than a vague acknowledgement of its concerns, Buenos Aires has turned its gaze to Washington in its attempt to stop what it says are illegal British activities in the disputed islands.

    The hastily scheduled meeting, announced by Hector Timerman, the Argentine Ambassador to Washington, will take place in Uruguay on Monday, when Mrs Clinton will attend the presidential inauguration of José Mujica. Argentina will be pressing the White House to drop its declared neutrality and support Buenos Aires in the dispute, which looks set to deteriorate further.

    Though President Reagan gave public backing and vital intelligence to Britain in the 1982 conflict over the islands, senior US officials now insist that Washington will stick with a policy of non-intervention. Philip Crowley, the State Department spokesman, said that the US maintained a position of neutrality but encouraged “good faith dialogue”, adding that if both sides requested mediation “we would consider it”.
    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle7041745.ece


    So they want to get the US on their side now eh? Typical.
    Last edited by xxMATTGxx; 26-02-2010 at 12:59 AM.


    Previous Habbox Roles
    Co-Owner of Habbox | General Manager | Assistant General Manager (Staff) | Forum Manager | Super Moderator | Forum Moderator

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    7,177
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MattGarner View Post
    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle7041745.ece


    So they want to get the US on their side now eh? Typical.
    Lol who the hell are they kidding? They don't stand a chance
    Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,817
    Tokens
    63,679
    Habbo
    FlyingJesus

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jordy View Post
    Obama: blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/ni...is-a-disgrace
    Was anyone else expecting something quite different when they clicked the link that displayed itself like this lol

    Quote Originally Posted by mrselenagomez View Post
    I'm honestly suprised were not in world war III. I think it's more publicity tbh, when do you see Argentina in the news?
    WWIII over the Falklands? I hardly think that too likely. As for publicity I don't think countries tend to invade each other just to get in the news, and with the world cup coming up Argentina will be fine for publicity.


    That quote from the Brazilian president doesn't seem to add up somehow. "Could it be because England is a permanent member of the UN's Security Council [where] they can do everything and the others nothing?" seems to suggest that we're actually in charge of something, which surely hasn't been the case for almost a century.
    | TWITTER |



    Blessed be
    + * + * + * +

  10. #20
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,000
    Tokens
    706
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I wonder what the US would of thought if the UK had remained 'neutral' when the twin towers were destroyed?

    I think now the US's true colours are coming out again because they have a history throughout with only looking after their own interests and leaving their 'friends' to it when they need help; in World War II they only joined in anyway because they became under threat as the Japanese Empire attacked them. The Suez Crisis - America threatened to pull the plug on the pound sterling if we did not abandon our own canal to the Epyptian government. Infact the only time America has only really been a true allie was when it was the Thatcher-Reagan partnership and of course they are no longer in office - even back then, the US refused to acknowledge that the UK has sovereignty over the Falklands.

    Lets leave Afghanistan and prepare to defend our sovereign territory, leave Obama to carry on with his Vietnam.
    Last edited by -:Undertaker:-; 26-02-2010 at 12:42 PM.

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •